Currently we take unit take coverate figure from top-level coverage element in cobertura XML. However to get better results we need to target the actual coverage for the package. See example below:
<coverage line-rate="0.5" branch-rate="0.5" version="1.9" timestamp="1683293601" lines-covered="152" lines-valid="348" branches-covered="16" branches-valid="52">
<sources>
<source>...</source>
</sources>
<packages>
<package name="Frends......" line-rate="0.9" branch-rate="0.75" complexity="10">
</package>
<package name="Frends......" line-rate="0.1" branch-rate="0.1" complexity="10">
</package>
</packages>
</coverage>
In the example above you can see that overall coverage can sometimes be diluted by neighbouring packages, which makes results inaccurate. So onstead of using /covarage attribute line-rate we should use /coverage/packages/package[@name='PackageName'].
Currently we take unit take coverate figure from top-level coverage element in cobertura XML. However to get better results we need to target the actual coverage for the package. See example below:
In the example above you can see that overall coverage can sometimes be diluted by neighbouring packages, which makes results inaccurate. So onstead of using
/covarageattribute line-rate we should use/coverage/packages/package[@name='PackageName'].