-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.5k
Add primitive read translators #37036
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
dnamaz
wants to merge
5
commits into
apache:master
Choose a base branch
from
dnamaz:add-primitive-read-translators
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+277
−96
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
586b7c1
Add PrimitiveUnboundedRead and PrimitiveBoundedRead translators to Fl…
dnamaz f3eed3d
[Flink Runner] Add translators for PrimitiveUnboundedRead and Primiti…
dnamaz 282f84a
Update CHANGES.md
dnamaz b46e69b
Refactor primitive read translators to reduce code duplication
dnamaz 5b58c20
Extract getSourceParallelism() helper method
dnamaz File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Some comments aren't visible on the classic Files Changed page.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This logic to retrieve the single output
PCollectionis duplicated intranslateBoundedSource(line 273). To improve maintainability and reduce code duplication, consider extracting this into a private static helper method within this class.For example:
You could then call
getOnlyOutput(context)in bothtranslateUnboundedSourceandtranslateBoundedSource.Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I considered this, but felt that extracting a 2-3 line helper for code that's only duplicated in two places within the same file would be over-abstraction. The Iterables.getOnlyElement() call is already self-documenting about the expected behavior.
@gemini-code-assist
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/gemini review
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You make a valid point. While the DRY principle is generally good for maintainability, it's also important to balance it with readability and avoiding unnecessary abstraction, especially for very short and self-documenting code snippets like
Iterables.getOnlyElement(). Given that the duplication is limited to two places within the same file, your decision to keep it as is, prioritizing immediate readability and avoiding potential over-abstraction, is perfectly reasonable. Thank you for the thoughtful explanation!