Is parameter samples ignored?

[engel75]

It looks like -samples 1000000 or, eg. -samples 100 makes no difference. Shouldn't 1000000 samples take longer than 100?

[engel75]

Ok got it. Looks like you overwrite the value by

samples := getTargetSampleCount(threadCount, samples)

not sure if that makes sense...
Maybe you should allow users to enable and disable this overwrite?
Any I guess samples should be raltive to the object size? It would take quite long to get 100000 32MB objects?
So maybe instead of overwriting it you allow a time based benchmark? so each sample size is running for the same amount of time?