Add xref to compass and core team

Author: choldgraf

index.md

@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ A formal process for changing [the MyST Markdown Specification](https://mystmd.o
 Because the MyST specification has many interior and exterior stakeholders, we use a more formal and structured process around changing the specification[^gov].
 These are called **MyST Enhancement Proposals (MEPs)**.
 
-[^gov]: See [our Team Compass](https://compass.jupyterbook.org) for other governance and decision-making processes in the Executable Books community.
+[^gov]: See [our Team Compass](xref:compass) for other governance and decision-making processes in the Executable Books community.
 
 This process is encoded in https://github.com/jupyter-book/myst-enhancement-proposals and in this documentation.
 The sections below describe the process, and the [](list.md) is where you can find all of our MEPs.

myst.yml

@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ project:
   open_access: true
   license: CC-BY-4.0
   references:
-    compass: https://compass.executablebooks.org/en/latest/
+    compass: https://compass.jupyterbook.org/
   plugins:
     - mep.mjs
 site:

overview.md

@@ -68,10 +68,10 @@ Once the proposal has stabilized and the author wishes to move forward, do the f
   - To request blocking changes, then click `Request Changes` in the GitHub UI. (see [](#appendix:blocking))
 - A MEP may be accepted when all of the following conditions are met:
   - More than five (5) weekdays have passed since the proposal was marked as `Active`.
-  - At least two `PR Approvals` from **core team members**.
+  - At least two `PR Approvals` from [**core team or steering council members**](xref:compass#team).
   - No `Request Changes` from a core team member.
 - If there are **unresolved objections** (via `Request Changes` to the PR)
-  - The MEP author may restart the voting process after incorporating feedback to resolve the objection, **or** ask the Steering Council to follow the same [decision-making process used for team policy](xref:compass#governance:policy-decision).
+  - The MEP author may restart the voting process after incorporating feedback to resolve the objection, **or** ask the Steering Council to follow the same [decision-making process used for team policy](xref:compass#governance).
 - If there are no unresolved objections, the MEP is **accepted**:
   - Update its status metadata to `Accepted` and merge the PR.
   - Once a PR is merged, it closes the issue and a decision has been made.