Replies: 3 comments 1 reply
-
Discord users don’t need a Roomy account to talk to Discord users. On both sides, messages from the other app will be posted by bot accounts as people’s proxies. This is already common practice for Discord/Matrix bridged communities. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Data sovereignty isn’t our main pitch; message gardening is. Discord-mirroring and data ownership is our early-adoption tactic since that’s the community we’re already immersed in.
This point in particular is something we would really love to do well! Read more about our prospective Network of Shared Purpose.
To be fair, all of these have achieved competitive market shares in their respective domains, they just didn’t completely dethrone the incumbent to become the dominant option. Telegram is worth billions, just not as many billions as the vertically integrated (aka monopolized) WhtsApp. And the better Twitter-alternative to analyze would be Bluesky, which already does better than Twitter in terms of real engagement. We’re approaching the network effects of Discord in much the same way (written while we were building with Matrix, but the same underlying principles of a protocol-driven approach still apply).
For our first batch, it’ll be: “Already got a Bluesky account for your project? Click this button and couple your social media account with a group chat instance.”
With seamless Discord bridging, as already popularized by Matrix.
That’ll be an interesting one, and the main subject matter I wanna invite you to explore with us. In the EU and North America businesses are accustomed to paying for community platforms. That might not be common practice in Nigeria?
💯 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Roomy Growth Strategy: Complete Implementation GuideA comprehensive strategic framework for global market expansion and community-led growth Executive SummaryRoomy is positioned to capture significant market share in the community platform space by solving the fundamental problem that Discord, Discourse, and enterprise tools all miss: seamless evolution from conversation to documentation. Core Strategic Advantages:
Market Positioning & Competitive LandscapePrimary Value Proposition"Transform conversations into lasting knowledge" - addressing the core weakness of existing platforms where valuable discussions disappear into digital noise. Target Market Segments1. Open Source Communities (Primary)
2. Educational Institutions (Secondary)
3. Creator Communities (Growth)
Competitive Positioning Matrix
Go-to-Market Strategy: 18-Month RoadmapPhase 1: Foundation (Months 1-6)Immediate Priorities
Success Metrics
Phase 2: Market Expansion (Months 7-12)Geographic Expansion
Creator Economy Integration
Phase 3: Platform Evolution (Months 13-18)Enterprise Market Entry
Platform Ecosystem Development
Content Marketing & Community GrowthContent Strategy FrameworkCore Content Pillars
Phase-Specific Content StrategyPhase 1 (Foundation): Platform education, Muni Town demonstrations, early user testimonials, Discord pain point analysis Phase 2 (Expansion): Success case studies from Phase 1 users, international market insights, educational use cases Phase 3 (Scale): Comprehensive transformation stories, enterprise case studies, ecosystem partner spotlights Distribution Channels (Prioritized)
Community-Led Growth TacticsAmbassador Program
Strategic Partnerships
International Expansion StrategyMarket Entry FrameworkTier 1 Markets (Phase 2)Latin America
Tier 2 Markets (Phase 3)Africa: Nigeria, Kenya, South Africa - community-first approach, local partnerships, $5-20/month pricing Europe: Germany, France, UK - GDPR-first messaging, enterprise focus, €20-500/month premium positioning Asia-Pacific: India, Singapore, Australia - diverse pricing tiers, local partnerships, $5-200/month range Localization Requirements
Revenue Model & Growth StrategyBusiness Model Approach
Market Share Targets
Growth Metrics Focus
Risk Analysis & MitigationPrimary Risks & Mitigation StrategiesCompetitive ResponseRisk: Discord improves documentation features or blocks bridging Mitigation: Focus on native value beyond bridging, develop direct migration tools, emphasize open protocol benefits Market SaturationRisk: Community platform market becomes oversaturated Mitigation: Geographic expansion to less competitive markets, focus on underserved niches (day-0 communities) Technical ChallengesRisk: Message gardening implementation complexity Mitigation: Extensive user testing, iterative development, fallback to traditional features while improving core innovation Funding ConstraintsRisk: Limited funding impacts growth speed Mitigation: Focus on organic growth and word-of-mouth, prioritize revenue-generating features, maintain conservative cash management Implementation Timeline & Milestones30-Day Quick Start
90-Day Foundation
6-Month Phase 1 Completion
12-Month Phase 2 Success
18-Month Phase 3 Achievement
Success Metrics & KPIsCommunity Health Metrics
Business Metrics
Growth Metrics
Long-term Vision: Beyond Community PlatformsThe Three-Phase Expansion
Platform Philosophy: Community-Owned KnowledgeRoomy represents more than platform replacement - it's infrastructure for community-owned knowledge creation and preservation. By enabling seamless evolution from conversation to documentation to public knowledge, Roomy addresses fundamental challenges in how human knowledge is created, organized, and shared in digital spaces. Sustainable Growth ModelThe steward-ownership approach ensures long-term alignment with community interests rather than extractive capital requirements. This sustainable model enables:
ConclusionRoomy is positioned to capture a significant portion of the community platform market by solving fundamental problems that existing solutions cannot address. The combination of day-0 community building, message gardening workflows, scale-based pricing, and open protocol benefits creates a defensible market position with clear paths for global expansion. The strategic framework outlined here provides a roadmap for achieving the ambitious vision of replacing Discord, Notion, and WordPress while building sustainable, community-focused infrastructure for the future of online knowledge collaboration. Implementation of this strategy requires disciplined execution, community-first thinking, and patient capital aligned with long-term value creation rather than short-term growth metrics. The opportunity exists to build not just a successful business, but infrastructure that fundamentally improves how human knowledge is created and preserved in digital communities. That vision is worth pursuing with the strategic rigor and community focus outlined in this framework. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Strategic Thoughts on Roomy's Go-to-Market Positioning
Background & Context
I've been following Roomy's development and had some conversations with @erlend-sh about the vision and early go-to-market strategy. For those unfamiliar, Roomy is an open-source group chat application built on ATProto and Automerge CRDTs that can bridge with Discord communities whilst enabling users to own their data and conversations.
The current early-adopter pitch focuses on helping businesses "keep your own sovereign mirror of your Discord space that you control" and using Roomy's features to transform chaotic messaging into structured knowledge artifacts.
While I'm genuinely impressed by the technical sophistication and philosophical depth of what the team is building, I wanted to share some observations about potential market positioning challenges and opportunities, particularly from the perspective of building products for emerging markets.
The Core Challenge I'm Seeing
There seems to be a potential disconnect between the problems Roomy solves and what most Discord users are actually trying to achieve. The "data sovereignty" and "platform independence" benefits, whilst genuinely important, typically only resonate with people who've already achieved economic stability - it's essentially a Maslow's hierarchy problem.
In my experience building products (particularly in markets like Nigeria), people join Discord and similar platforms primarily to:
The Jobs-to-be-Done Question
When someone is evaluating Roomy, what job are they hiring it to do?
The current positioning seems to be "own your data and escape platform capture," but most Discord server owners are thinking "How do I grow my community and create value for members?"
The way Roomy currently approaches the problem - focusing on digital sovereignty and data ownership - is addressing higher-level needs on Maslow's hierarchy (self-actualisation) when most potential users are still focused on more fundamental needs like economic security and social belonging.
Potential Repositioning Strategies
Rather than leading with sovereignty, what if we led with enhancement? Some possibilities:
Community Growth Engine
Professional Network Builder
Local Economic Networks
Learning from Adjacent Solutions
The Facebook/Craigslist Model
Facebook's early strategy offers an interesting parallel. They didn't just offer "a better way to post classifieds" - they built APIs that could pull Craigslist listings and post Facebook content to Craigslist, then offered "your classifieds plus social connections plus discovery." They solved immediate problems (finding/selling stuff) whilst building their own network effects.
For Roomy, this might mean: "Your Discord community plus web presence plus cross-platform networking plus [something Discord can't do]."
The Linen.dev Approach
There's a YC-backed startup called Linen.dev that makes Slack and Discord communities Google-searchable by syncing threads to SEO-friendly websites. Their approach wasn't about data ownership - it was about solving discoverability and reducing repeat questions. They turned community conversations into SEO assets, creating value for both community owners and members.
The Individual User Challenge
There's also the individual user adoption challenge to consider. For someone to chat with Discord users through Roomy, those Discord users would first need to be on Roomy too - which means convincing people to join yet another platform.
This is the classic network effect challenge that Signal, Telegram, and Mastodon face:
The question becomes: what's Roomy's compelling reason for individual users to make the switch or add another platform to their workflow?
Discussion Questions
I'd love to hear thoughts from the community on:
Market Entry Strategy: What's the most compelling hook for getting people to try Roomy initially?
Network Effects: How might we solve the "my community is already on Discord" problem?
Value Proposition: What jobs could Roomy do better than Discord that would make people willing to convince their communities to try it?
Regional Strategies: How might positioning differ across markets with different economic priorities?
Bridge Strategy: Could the Discord bridge be the trojan horse that gets people in, with other benefits becoming apparent over time?
Context for Discussion
I'm sharing this not to criticise the current approach, but because I believe Roomy has genuinely innovative technical foundations that could enable some really powerful use cases. The challenge is finding the market entry point where the value is immediately obvious, even to people who've never thought about data sovereignty.
What do you think? Are there angles I'm missing? Different ways to think about positioning that could address these challenges?
For those interested in the technical details, check out the Roomy deep dive and the broader Muni Town blog for context on the vision and architecture.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions