Skip to content

Question about DMR pair results #590

@zine-el-aabidine

Description

@zine-el-aabidine

Dear,

Thank you for your efforts in updating the version following the requested changes.

I ran DMR pair twice, with and without the --min-valid-coverage 10 option. For the same modification site, I obtained different a_count and b_count values, as well as different statistics. I ran the same command on the same file using --base A and --single-code "a".

I would be very grateful for your help.

Kind regards,

<style> </style>
  #chrom start end name score strand a_counts a_total b_counts b_total a_mod_percentages b_mod_percentages a_pct_modified b_pct_modified map_pvalue effect_size balanced_map_pvalue balanced_effect_size pct_a_samples pct_b_samples replicate_map_pvalues replicate_effect_sizes cohen_h cohen_h_low cohen_h_high
without_min_coverage 2L 21012 21013 . 1.9818691992013413 - a:0 31 a:3 28 a:0.00 a:10.71 0 0.10714286 0.4706322371851205 -0.10714285714285714 1 -0.037037037037037035 100 100 0.45672346927925245,1,1 -0.2,0,0 -0.66694634794494 0.155954191101083 1.1779385047887971
with min_coverage_10 2L 21012 21013 . 2.729244391195497 - a:0 24 a:3 15 a:0.00 a:20.00 0 0.2 0.1263947920523823 -0.2 0.1263947920523823 -0.2 66 33 - - -0.9272952254521929 0.2821921027589833 1.5723983481454025

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions