Hi,
I'm comparing the result of evaluating a VDB grid obtained by converting a mesh to SDF via openvdb::tools::meshToVolume. It seems that the results given by Grid.sample_trilinear() give incorrect values outside of the narrow-band, whereas openvdb::tools::BoxSampler::sample() correctly evaluate the sign and background distance outside of the narrow-band:
| fVDB Sampling |
OpenVDB Sampling |
 |
 |
I don't see any notion of tile/background data in fVDB's documentation, so I imagine this data is lost when importing a volume from a NanoVDB grid?
Hi,
I'm comparing the result of evaluating a VDB grid obtained by converting a mesh to SDF via
openvdb::tools::meshToVolume. It seems that the results given byGrid.sample_trilinear()give incorrect values outside of the narrow-band, whereasopenvdb::tools::BoxSampler::sample()correctly evaluate the sign and background distance outside of the narrow-band:I don't see any notion of tile/background data in fVDB's documentation, so I imagine this data is lost when importing a volume from a NanoVDB grid?