Suggestion: Branch Protection & Code Review Process #7087
matthewford
started this conversation in
General
Replies: 1 comment 3 replies
-
|
Hi @matthewford 👋 Thank you for your feedback. I can confirm we already have branch protection rules and required CI checks to allow a PR to be merged:
Admittedly, PR from the internal team doesn't get systematically reviewed. This is our current process right now that allows us to move fast. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
3 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment



Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi Polar team,
First off, I wanted to say that Polar is a great project! We're an agency that have implemented a number of payment gateways for clients, and we're excited about potentially testing Polar as a merchant of record solution. The open-source approach and what you're building is great to see.
I noticed while reviewing the repository that some commits are being pushed directly to the main branch and deployed to production without going through a code review.
With the recent surge in supply chain attacks and increased scrutiny on security practices in the payments/fintech space, implementing branch protection rules and mandatory code reviews would significantly strengthen your security posture. This is especially important for a billing platform handling sensitive financial data.
Additionally, if SOC 2 compliance is on your roadmap (which many enterprise customers will expect), auditors will flag direct production pushes as a control deficiency. It's much easier to implement these practices early than to retrofit them later.
Quick wins:
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions