Merge pull request #14 from kazanTW/master

update content to 2025 version

Author: andylee830914

README.md

@@ -1,21 +1,21 @@
-# PyCon TW 2024 Reviewer Guide 審稿指南
+# PyCon TW 2025 Reviewer Guide 審稿指南
 
 (English below)
 
-您好，歡迎您加入 PyCon TW 2024 審稿的行列。請點選 [審稿指南](reviewer-guide.md) 開始了解審稿流程。
+您好，歡迎您加入 PyCon TW 2025 審稿的行列。請點選 [審稿指南](reviewer-guide.md) 開始了解審稿流程。
 
 本次審稿的表定時程如下：
-+ Apr 8: Call for Proposals 截止
-+ Apr 9 ~ Apr 30: 第一階段審稿
-+ May 7 ~ May 20: 投稿者修稿階段
-+ May 21 ~ Jun 3: 第二階段審稿
-+ Jun 10: 完成入選、備取、拒絕稿件清單
++ Apr 5: Call for Proposals 截止
++ Apr 6 ~ Apr 26: 第一階段審稿
++ May 4 ~ May 17: 投稿者修稿階段
++ May 18 ~ May 31: 第二階段審稿
++ Jun 14: 完成入選、備取、拒絕稿件清單
 
-Hi, welcome to PyCon TW 2024 proposals review.  Please visit [Proposal Review Process](reviewer-guide.en.md) to read the detailed description of the review process.
+Hi, welcome to PyCon TW 2025 proposals review.  Please visit [Proposal Review Process](reviewer-guide.en.md) to read the detailed description of the review process.
 
 Our schedule is as follows:
-+ Apr 8: End of Call for Proposals
-+ Apr 9 ~ Apr 30: First round review
-+ May 7 ~ May 20: Modification stage for submitters
-+ May 21 ~ Jun 3: Second round review
-+ Jun 10: Announce accepted and rejected proposals, and waiting list
++ Apr 5: End of Call for Proposals
++ Apr 6 ~ Apr 26: First round review
++ May 4 ~ May 17: Modification stage for submitters
++ May 18 ~ May 31: Second round review
++ Jun 14: Announce accepted and rejected proposals, and waiting list

reviewer-guide.en.md

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 # Proposal Review Process
 
-In PyCon TW 2024, our proposal review process is based on **Two Round** review.
+In PyCon TW 2025, our proposal review process is based on **Two Round** review.
 
 Please login to PyCon TW reviewing system to review, and we **WILL NOT** reveal your identity in the whole review process.
 
@@ -27,11 +27,11 @@ After review, we will email the second round votes and comments to authors. If y
 
 # Notice
 + Giving **constructive comments** is helpful for the review process, and helps author in the modification stage.
-+ When rating, please put yourself into author's shoes, refer to [《How to Propose a Talk》](https://tw.pycon.org/2024/en-us/speaking/talk) about good ideas and bad ideas as judging criteria. We also welcome reviewers to give us more advice on how to distinguish good and bad ideas for proposals.
++ When rating, please put yourself into author's shoes, refer to [《How to Propose a Talk》](https://tw.pycon.org/2025/en-us/speaking/talk) about good ideas and bad ideas as judging criteria. We also welcome reviewers to give us more advice on how to distinguish good and bad ideas for proposals.
 + Please vote and comment according to **Python Level** of the proposal.
-For Python Level, please refer to [《How to Choose the Python Level》](https://tw.pycon.org/2024/en-us/speaking/talk)。
+For Python Level, please refer to [《How to Choose the Python Level》](https://tw.pycon.org/2025/en-us/speaking/talk)。
 + Although accepting or rejecting is our standard as reviewers, but for PyCon TW, it's not only about accepting and rejecting, but also to foster the community. Please judge in a mindset of **how to make the proposal better**, not just yes or no.
-+ Even though the review process is anonymous, we should respect author and follow PyCon TW [Code of Conduct](https://tw.pycon.org/2024/en-us/about/code-of-conduct).
++ Even though the review process is anonymous, we should respect author and follow PyCon TW [Code of Conduct](https://tw.pycon.org/2025/en-us/about/code-of-conduct).
 
 # Details
 + Language options for proposals can be: English talk and non-English talk. When an author choose to do **English talk**, please use English to comment.
@@ -43,10 +43,10 @@ For Python Level, please refer to [《How to Choose the Python Level》](https:/
 There are four different vote options: -1, -0, +0, +1.
 
 Each vote option's meaning is as follows:
-* **-1**：Strong Reject    This **SHOULD NOT** be in PyCon TW 2024
+* **-1**：Strong Reject    This **SHOULD NOT** be in PyCon TW 2025
 * **-0**：Weak Reject
 * **+0**：Weak Accept
-* **+1**：Strong Accept    This **SHOULD** be in PyCon TW 2024
+* **+1**：Strong Accept    This **SHOULD** be in PyCon TW 2025
 
 
 # Q & A

reviewer-guide.md

@@ -26,11 +26,11 @@ Review 結束後，我們會整理第二回合的評分與評論，以匿名的
 
 # 審稿注意事項
 + 評分時給予**建設性的回饋**有助於評分的收束，以及修改階段時的參考價值，並讓投稿者有所成長。
-+ 評分時，請站在投稿者的角度，參考[《如何投稿》](https://tw.pycon.org/2024/zh-hant/speaking/talk)裡投稿的好主意與投稿的壞主意作主要評斷。當然 PyCon TW 也很歡迎審稿者給我們更多建議，告訴我們什麼樣是投稿的好主意與壞主意。
++ 評分時，請站在投稿者的角度，參考[《如何投稿》](https://tw.pycon.org/2025/zh-hant/speaking/talk)裡投稿的好主意與投稿的壞主意作主要評斷。當然 PyCon TW 也很歡迎審稿者給我們更多建議，告訴我們什麼樣是投稿的好主意與壞主意。
 + 稿件有分三個不同的 Python 難易度，請**根據對應的難易度來審稿**。
-難易度的判斷可以參考官網[《如何設定投稿的 Python 難易度？》](https://tw.pycon.org/2024/zh-hant/speaking/talk)介紹。
+難易度的判斷可以參考官網[《如何設定投稿的 Python 難易度？》](https://tw.pycon.org/2025/zh-hant/speaking/talk)介紹。
 + 需要注意一點的是，雖然我們是審稿者，接受與拒絕是評分的標準。但對 PyCon TW 來說其實不是接受與拒絕，而是一個長期社群的培養。試著站在 PyCon TW 與投稿者的立場，評論以**如何將一份投稿變的更好**為方向，而非一個法官決定判刑與否。
-+ 即使匿名，請尊重投稿者並遵守大會的[行為準則](https://tw.pycon.org/2024/zh-hant/about/code-of-conduct)。
++ 即使匿名，請尊重投稿者並遵守大會的[行為準則](https://tw.pycon.org/2025/zh-hant/about/code-of-conduct)。
 
 # 審稿細節
 + 演講語言可分為：英文演講與非英文演講。當投稿者選擇**英文演講**時，請使用英文作為審稿回覆。
@@ -39,10 +39,10 @@ Review 結束後，我們會整理第二回合的評分與評論，以匿名的
 ### 評分方式
 評分只有四種：-1、-0、+0、+1。
 解釋各評分的意義：
-* **-1**：strong reject    這講題「不該」出現在 PyCon TW 2024
+* **-1**：strong reject    這講題「不該」出現在 PyCon TW 2025
 * **-0**：weak reject
 * **+0**：weak accept
-* **+1**：strong accept    這議題「務必」出現在 PyCon TW 2024
+* **+1**：strong accept    這議題「務必」出現在 PyCon TW 2025
 
 # Q & A
 **Q**: 因為某些原因，我能知道或猜得到某個稿件的作者是誰。基於第一階段的身份不公開原則，這可能會有利益衝突，那麼我有資格審查這份稿件嗎？