You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: reviewer-guide.en.md
+13-14Lines changed: 13 additions & 14 deletions
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -26,31 +26,30 @@ Please login to PyCon TW reviewing system to review, and we **WILL NOT** reveal
26
26
After review, we will email the second round votes and comments to authors. If you don't want to disclose your votes & comments, please change the "Disclose comment to proposal submitter" field to "No".
27
27
28
28
# Notice
29
-
+ Giving **constructive comments** is helpful for the review process, and helps author in the modification stage.
30
-
+ When rating, please put yourself into author's shoes, refer to [《How to Propose a Talk》](https://tw.pycon.org/2025/en-us/speaking/talk) about good ideas and bad ideas as judging criteria. We also welcome reviewers to give us more advice on how to distinguish good and bad ideas for proposals.
31
-
+ Please vote and comment according to **Python Level** of the proposal.
29
+
- Giving **constructive comments** is helpful for the review process, and helps author in the modification stage.
30
+
- When rating, please put yourself into author's shoes, refer to [《How to Propose a Talk》](https://tw.pycon.org/2025/en-us/speaking/talk) about good ideas and bad ideas as judging criteria. We also welcome reviewers to give us more advice on how to distinguish good and bad ideas for proposals.
31
+
- Please vote and comment according to **Python Level** of the proposal.
32
32
For Python Level, please refer to [《How to Choose the Python Level》](https://tw.pycon.org/2025/en-us/speaking/talk)。
33
-
+ Although accepting or rejecting is our standard as reviewers, but for PyCon TW, it's not only about accepting and rejecting, but also to foster the community. Please judge in a mindset of **how to make the proposal better**, not just yes or no.
34
-
+ Even though the review process is anonymous, we should respect author and follow PyCon TW [Code of Conduct](https://tw.pycon.org/2025/en-us/about/code-of-conduct).
33
+
- Although accepting or rejecting is our standard as reviewers, but for PyCon TW, it's not only about accepting and rejecting, but also to foster the community. Please judge in a mindset of **how to make the proposal better**, not just yes or no.
34
+
- Even though the review process is anonymous, we should respect author and follow PyCon TW [Code of Conduct](https://tw.pycon.org/2025/en-us/about/code-of-conduct).
35
35
36
36
# Details
37
-
+ Language options for proposals can be: English talk and non-English talk. When an author choose to do **English talk**, please use English to comment.
38
-
+ Due to the large volume of proposals over the years, we strongly recommend that you prioritize reviewing proposals that are more closely related to your technical background. After that, you can proceed to review proposals from fields you have experience with, in order.
39
-
+ If you encounter a field that you are not familiar with, you may choose not to review the proposal.
37
+
- Language options for proposals can be: English talk and non-English talk. When an author choose to do **English talk**, please use English to comment.
38
+
- Due to the large volume of proposals over the years, we strongly recommend that you prioritize reviewing proposals that are more closely related to your technical background. After that, you can proceed to review proposals from fields you have experience with, in order.
39
+
- If you encounter a field that you are not familiar with, you may choose not to review the proposal.
40
40
41
41
# Voting and Acceptance
42
42
### Voting
43
43
44
44
There are four different vote options: -1, -0, +0, +1.
45
45
46
46
Each vote option's meaning is as follows:
47
-
***-1**：Strong Reject This **SHOULD NOT** be in PyCon TW 2025
48
-
***-0**：Weak Reject This **IS ACCEPTABLE, BUT SLIGHTLY NOT RECOMMENDED** to be in PyCon TW 2025
49
-
***+0**：Weak Accept This **IS ACCEPTABLE, AND SLIGHTLY RECOMMENDED** to be in PyCon TW 2025
50
-
***+1**：Strong Accept This **SHOULD** be in PyCon TW 2025
47
+
***-1**：Strong Reject This **SHOULD NOT** be in PyCon TW
48
+
***-0**：Weak Reject This **IS ACCEPTABLE, BUT SLIGHTLY NOT RECOMMENDED** to be in PyCon TW
49
+
***+0**：Weak Accept This **IS ACCEPTABLE, AND SLIGHTLY RECOMMENDED** to be in PyCon TW
50
+
***+1**：Strong Accept This **SHOULD** be in PyCon TW
51
51
52
52
# Reviewer's Responsibility and Review Rate
53
-
Dear Reviewers,
54
53
Thank you very much for agreeing to serve as a reviewer for this conference. Your professional contributions are essential to ensuring the technical quality of the conference. We understand that you have a busy schedule and other personal commitments. However, your participation plays a critical role in enhancing the quality and fairness of the conference.
55
54
56
55
In order to ensure a smooth review process and to guarantee that each proposal is reviewed in a timely and thorough manner, we hope to achieve the following common goals:
@@ -66,7 +65,7 @@ In addition to the quantity of reviews, we also emphasize the quality of reviews
66
65
### 3. In Case You Cannot Review on Time
67
66
If, for any reason, you are unable to complete a review on time due to scheduling or other issues, please inform us as soon as possible. We will do our best to assist you. You can contact us at [email protected].
68
67
69
-
### 4. Thank You for Your Support and Understanding
68
+
# Thank You for Your Support and Understanding
70
69
We truly appreciate the time you have dedicated to reviewing proposals amidst your busy work or personal schedule. Your contribution is invaluable, and we sincerely thank you for your support. We look forward to making this conference a smooth and outstanding event with your help.
0 commit comments