You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
If you ship geospatial or vision workloads, you’ve likely written this stage countless times: standardize each 4K tile, apply a small radiometric correction, gamma‑correct, and run a quick QC metric. On CPUs this is fine—until the batch grows and your wall‑clock explodes.
4
4
5
-
In this article, we benchmark the performance of RunMat against NumPy, PyTorch, and Julia.
5
+
In this article, we benchmark the performance of RunMat against NumPy, and PyTorch.
6
6
7
7
The math is deliberately simple and realistic: compute a per‑image mean and standard deviation, normalize, apply a modest gain/bias and a gamma curve, then validate with a mean‑squared error.
8
8
9
9
---
10
10
11
11
## Results
12
12
13
-

13
+

Note: MATLAB’s license agreement restricts usage of their runtime for benchmarking, so we do not include MATLAB runs. If you have numbers, consider sharing them on GitHub Discussions.
0 commit comments