We did an automated analysis of your code to detect potential areas to improve the code quality. We are sharing the results below, so that you can avoid similar problems in your tP code (which will be graded more strictly for code quality).
IMPORTANT: Note that the script looked for just a few easy-to-detect problems only, and at-most three example are given i.e., there can be other areas/places to improve.
Aspect: Tab Usage
No easy-to-detect issues 👍
Aspect: Naming boolean variables/methods
Example from src/main/java/duke/Task.java lines 5-5:
private boolean completed;
Suggestion: Follow the given naming convention for boolean variables/methods (e.g., use a boolean-soundingprefix).You may ignore the above if you think the name already follows the convention (the script can report false positives in some cases)
Aspect: Brace Style
No easy-to-detect issues 👍
Aspect: Package Name Style
No easy-to-detect issues 👍
Aspect: Class Name Style
No easy-to-detect issues 👍
Aspect: Dead Code
Example from src/main/java/duke/Duke.java lines 28-28:
Example from src/main/java/duke/Duke.java lines 29-29:
// boolean isExit = false;
Example from src/main/java/duke/Duke.java lines 31-31:
Suggestion: Remove dead code from the codebase.
Aspect: Method Length
No easy-to-detect issues 👍
Aspect: Class size
No easy-to-detect issues 👍
Aspect: Header Comments
Example from src/main/java/duke/Ui.java lines 18-20:
/**
* Message to be seen by user upon closing the program.
*/
Example from src/main/java/duke/Ui.java lines 25-27:
/**
* Message to be seen by user if hard disk file does not exist.
*/
Example from src/main/java/duke/Ui.java lines 32-36:
/**
* Prefix for error messages.
*
* @param msg The error message
*/
Suggestion: Ensure method/class header comments follow the format specified in the coding standard, in particular, the phrasing of the overview statement
Aspect: Recent Git Commit Message (Subject Only)
No easy-to-detect issues 👍
❗ You are not required to (but you are welcome to) fix the above problems in your iP, unless you have been separately asked to resubmit the iP due to code quality issues.
ℹ️ The bot account @nus-se-bot used to post this issue is un-manned. Do not reply to this post (as those replies will not be read). Instead, contact cs2103@comp.nus.edu.sg if you want to follow up on this post.
We did an automated analysis of your code to detect potential areas to improve the code quality. We are sharing the results below, so that you can avoid similar problems in your tP code (which will be graded more strictly for code quality).
IMPORTANT: Note that the script looked for just a few easy-to-detect problems only, and at-most three example are given i.e., there can be other areas/places to improve.
Aspect: Tab Usage
No easy-to-detect issues 👍
Aspect: Naming boolean variables/methods
Example from
src/main/java/duke/Task.javalines5-5:Suggestion: Follow the given naming convention for boolean variables/methods (e.g., use a boolean-soundingprefix).You may ignore the above if you think the name already follows the convention (the script can report false positives in some cases)
Aspect: Brace Style
No easy-to-detect issues 👍
Aspect: Package Name Style
No easy-to-detect issues 👍
Aspect: Class Name Style
No easy-to-detect issues 👍
Aspect: Dead Code
Example from
src/main/java/duke/Duke.javalines28-28:// public void run() {Example from
src/main/java/duke/Duke.javalines29-29:// boolean isExit = false;Example from
src/main/java/duke/Duke.javalines31-31:// while (!isExit) {Suggestion: Remove dead code from the codebase.
Aspect: Method Length
No easy-to-detect issues 👍
Aspect: Class size
No easy-to-detect issues 👍
Aspect: Header Comments
Example from
src/main/java/duke/Ui.javalines18-20:Example from
src/main/java/duke/Ui.javalines25-27:Example from
src/main/java/duke/Ui.javalines32-36:Suggestion: Ensure method/class header comments follow the format specified in the coding standard, in particular, the phrasing of the overview statement
Aspect: Recent Git Commit Message (Subject Only)
No easy-to-detect issues 👍
❗ You are not required to (but you are welcome to) fix the above problems in your iP, unless you have been separately asked to resubmit the iP due to code quality issues.
ℹ️ The bot account @nus-se-bot used to post this issue is un-manned. Do not reply to this post (as those replies will not be read). Instead, contact
cs2103@comp.nus.edu.sgif you want to follow up on this post.