Broken link found in 3.2 UI Component of DG

[skythefire]

Upon clicking MainWindow in the text, I am redirected to the following "Not Found" page rather than the GitHub code.

The link used by the Dev team is:
https://github.com/se-edu/AY2122S1-CS2103T-W10-3/tp/master/src/main/java/seedu/address/ui/MainWindow.java

I believe the link that should have been used is:
https://github.com/AY2122S1-CS2103T-W10-3/tp/blob/master/src/main/java/seedu/address/ui/MainWindow.java

[nus-pe-bot]

Team's Response

Accepted as a valid documentation bug. Thank you for pointing this out!

The 'Original' Bug

[The team marked this bug as a duplicate of the following bug]

MainWindow hyperlink not working

Note from the teaching team: This bug was reported during the Part II (Evaluating Documents) stage of the PE. You may reject this bug if it is not related to the quality of documentation.

---

When clicking the hyperlink for MainWindow, opens up github to a not found page.

---

_{[original: nus-cs2103-AY2122S1/pe-interim#3139] [original labels: severity.Medium type.DocumentationBug]}

Their Response to the 'Original' Bug

[This is the team's response to the above 'original' bug]

Thank you for pointing this bug out! Based on the CS2103T website which lists the criteria for documentation bugs, broken links can either have a severity of low or medium depending on "how much inconvenience they cause to the reader":

We believe that this MainWindow broken link is of low severity because it is still easy to navigate to it by clicking on the Ui.java hyperlink specified in the first sentence of 3.2 UI component. Given that a hyperlink of nearby significance is given, we think it warrants a low severity because the inconvenience to the reader is not drastic, especially because it is known to the reader to look under the Ui folder to find the MainWindow.java class.

Items for the Tester to Verify

❓ Issue duplicate status

Team chose to mark this issue as a duplicate of another issue (as explained in the Team's response above)

• I disagree

Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your explanation]

---

❓ Issue severity

Team chose [severity.Low]
Originally [severity.VeryLow]

• I disagree

Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your explanation]

---