Summary:
The Stan language should have the ability to create user-defined member functions of the model class
Description:
At the last meeting, we proposed adding a new block to the Stan language that perhaps could be called local functions that would go after transformed data. The Stan syntax would be the same as in the functions block but unlike the user-defined functions in the functions block the user-defined functions in the local functions block could refer to objects in the data and transformed data blocks without explicitly passing them as arguments. This would make such functions much easier to use than integrate_ode, which requires fixed arguments to be passed in a very clunky way. It might look like
data {
int<lower=1> N;
}
transformed data {
int<lower=2> two_N;
two_N = 2 * N;
}
local functions {
void what_is_2N() {
print("2N = ", two_N);
}
}
Reproducible Steps:
Does not currently exist.
Current Output:
Does not currently exist.
Expected Output:
Whatever the user-defined function returns
Additional Information:
None
Current Version:
v2.11.0
Summary:
The Stan language should have the ability to create user-defined member functions of the model class
Description:
At the last meeting, we proposed adding a new block to the Stan language that perhaps could be called
local functionsthat would go aftertransformed data. The Stan syntax would be the same as in thefunctionsblock but unlike the user-defined functions in thefunctionsblock the user-defined functions in thelocal functionsblock could refer to objects in thedataandtransformed datablocks without explicitly passing them as arguments. This would make such functions much easier to use thanintegrate_ode, which requires fixed arguments to be passed in a very clunky way. It might look likeReproducible Steps:
Does not currently exist.
Current Output:
Does not currently exist.
Expected Output:
Whatever the user-defined function returns
Additional Information:
None
Current Version:
v2.11.0