Add Ben Allen's summaries

Author: gesa

meetings/2025-09/september-22.md

@@ -439,7 +439,8 @@ BAN: Fantastic. All right. And next up is the other one, the other normative cha
 
 ### Speaker's Summary of Key Points
 
-This PR allows implementations to take into account potential differences between the short compact form ("5K") and long form ("5 thousand") when determining the correct plural form to use.
+* Proposed change will allow use of differing plural rules for short vs long compact notation when CLDR adds support for them
+* No change to current behaviour of any engine
 
 ### Conclusion
 
@@ -628,7 +629,9 @@ CDA: Thank you. I mean I know there was at least one constraint on this item, bu
 
 ### Speaker's Summary of Key Points
 
-(see final continuation)
+* Functionality involving arithmetic removed from proposal, rounding only performed on way in
+* Support for non-mathematical values in domain of Number added, i.e. -0, ±Infinity, NaN
+* Concerns expressed by WH re: handling of significant digits, particularly for zero values
 
 ### Conclusion
 

meetings/2025-09/september-23.md

@@ -100,8 +100,8 @@ BAN: Thanks so much.
 
 ### Speaker's Summary of Key Points
 
-* Intl month code supports many calendars defined in CLDR + ICU4C/ICU4X
-* We cannot specify arithmetic for every calendar, but we do want guardrails around implementation to avoid divergence between implementations
+* Description of normative PR to revert the change to handling of leap months from last plenary, returning to rejecting operations that would yield a nonexistent date because of the absence of a leap month. Previous behavior pushed forward to the next non-leap month, proposed behaviour results in a RangeError when using the option {overflow: "reject"}
+* Description of normative PR for Temporal that allows for reference dates in the near future, in order to account for the rare leap month that will appear in the Chinese calendar in 2033.
 
 ### Conclusion
 

meetings/2025-09/september-24.md

@@ -196,7 +196,11 @@ RCH: All right. Let’s see. `Object.entry` and `Object.fromEntires` is a case w
 
 ### Speaker's Summary of Key Points
 
-* Discussed and proposed solutions for V8 concerns and WH concerns re: sig digits
+* Discussion of changes made to handling of significant digits based on feedback from Day 1 presentation
+* Extensive discussion of name of proposal
+* Extensive discussion on whether or not to include numerical conversion methods
+* Discussion of whether interchange is understood to be a motivation for Amount proposal
+* KG expresses concerns re: motivation of proposal
 
 ### Conclusion
 
@@ -472,6 +476,12 @@ BAN: Okay.
 
 CDA: I did mention in the point of order but I captured the queue from Monday, and then completely forgot to paste them in here. Some of them may have been covered as NRO pointed out, but I will add them in. Please remind me in case I forget again. I will add them in later this afternoon and if we skip over them because we covered it sufficiently, it’s fine. They’re all from SFC. Shall we break for lunch?
 
+### Speaker's summary of key points
+
+* Functionality involving arithmetic removed from proposal, rounding only performed on way in
+* Support for non-mathematical values in domain of Number added, i.e. -0, ±Infinity, NaN
+* Concerns expressed by WH re: handling of significant digits, particularly for zero values
+
 ## Continuation: Update on proposal-module-global
 
 Presenter: Kris Kowal (KKL)