-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 645
MAINT FIX: Moving Message metadata to AttackResult and attack score fix #1316
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Draft
rlundeen2
wants to merge
9
commits into
Azure:main
Choose a base branch
from
rlundeen2:users/rlundeen/2026_01_10_move_metadata_to_result
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Draft
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
03d511b
Refactor to move metadata from messages to results
rlundeen2 8ffe59f
fixing tests
rlundeen2 20acb3b
adding tests
rlundeen2 ce4fa40
Merge branch 'main' into users/rlundeen/2026_01_10_move_metadata_to_r…
rlundeen2 e7894d7
updating tests
rlundeen2 f205d2c
merging main
rlundeen2 655d229
pre-commit
rlundeen2 8eb53a4
pre-commit
rlundeen2 9fd23cb
Merge branch 'main' into users/rlundeen/2026_01_10_move_metadata_to_r…
rlundeen2 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have a few concerns with this:
request_converters: Optional[list[Any]]is too loosely typed. When you useAny, it removes IDE autocompletion/type checking and makes it really unclear what callers should pass.request_convertersonly acceptslist[PromptConverterConfiguration]orlist[PromptConverter]. We should make sure the signature explicitly uses a union (e.g.,Optional[list[PromptConverterConfiguration | PromptConverter]]).hasattrhere is really not ideal because it can fail silently if you ever rename the attribute. For example, ifPromptConverterConfiguration.converterswere renamed toconvs, this code would still type-check and run but would not behave correctly and would be a hidden bug in the code. If we useUnion, it would be safer to branch usingisinstance()and handle each type explicitly.I would push back a bit on adding all the identifier fields directly to AttackResult and removing the dataclass. It bloats the class, loses the dataclass benefits (
__repr__,__eq__, field defaults), and turnsAttackResultinto a catch-all bucket. I think a cleaner pattern is adding a single structured field that groups related identifiers:Then
AttackResultjust gets one new field which islineage: Optional[AttackLineage] = None. This keeps the dataclass, groups related tracking info logically, and is easy to extend later without ever touchingAttackResultagain.Here's how the helper methods would look: