Skip to content

chore!: consistent contract naming, add SignatureVerificationLib#388

Merged
rjan90 merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
rvagg/deployments_names
Jan 13, 2026
Merged

chore!: consistent contract naming, add SignatureVerificationLib#388
rjan90 merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
rvagg/deployments_names

Conversation

@rvagg
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@rvagg rvagg commented Jan 13, 2026

BREAKING change because it renames keys here but they are very inconsistent and confusing and the PDP ones don't even show you what the proxy is.


I had to go use this today and was a bit frustrated it was less useful than I imagined.

@rjan90 I got SIGNATURE_VERIFICATION_LIB_ADDRESS off a message in Slack from you for calibnet but had to go hunting on the chain for the mainnet one, I'm pretty sure that's it by the bytecode match but you might just want to see if you have a record of that being the right address for mainnet.

BREAKING change because it renames keys here but they are very inconsistent
and confusing and the PDP ones don't even show you what the proxy is.
@rvagg rvagg requested review from rjan90 and wjmelements January 13, 2026 06:32
@FilOzzy FilOzzy added this to FOC Jan 13, 2026
@github-project-automation github-project-automation Bot moved this to 📌 Triage in FOC Jan 13, 2026
@rjan90
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

rjan90 commented Jan 13, 2026

Confirming that both the SIGNATURE_VERIFICATION_LIB_ADDRESS address for:

How useful are these addresses? Is there a chance that these will be updated/changed?

@github-project-automation github-project-automation Bot moved this from 📌 Triage to ✔️ Approved by reviewer in FOC Jan 13, 2026
@rjan90 rjan90 added this to the M4: Filecoin Service Liftoff milestone Jan 13, 2026
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@wjmelements wjmelements left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

also need to change the tools scripts

@github-project-automation github-project-automation Bot moved this from ✔️ Approved by reviewer to ⌨️ In Progress in FOC Jan 13, 2026
@wjmelements
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

See #364

@rvagg
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

rvagg commented Jan 13, 2026

also need to change the tools scripts

oh gee, I didn't realise these were all used internally.

Done in the latest commit. But it's a little invasive and changes how you use the scripts from the outside given that the vars have changed but I don't think that should be a major problem for anyone since these are mainly dev scripts? @rjan90 you'd better take a careful look at these and see if you approve of going this far.

@github-project-automation github-project-automation Bot moved this from ⌨️ In Progress to ✔️ Approved by reviewer in FOC Jan 13, 2026
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@rjan90 rjan90 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fine by me! As long as we agree on the wording, it should not cause any issues

@rjan90 rjan90 merged commit 8e44651 into main Jan 13, 2026
6 checks passed
@rjan90 rjan90 deleted the rvagg/deployments_names branch January 13, 2026 07:54
@github-project-automation github-project-automation Bot moved this from ✔️ Approved by reviewer to 🎉 Done in FOC Jan 13, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: 🎉 Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants