-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
Update #32
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Update #32
Conversation
WalkthroughThis update removes all Jenkins pipeline scripts for both backend and frontend, deletes the entire Terraform infrastructure-as-code stack for Jenkins server provisioning (including VPC, EC2, IAM, and associated scripts/configurations), and eliminates the Kubernetes Ingress manifest. A new consolidated Jenkins pipeline is introduced in Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Jenkins
participant GitHub
participant SonarQube
participant AWS ECR
participant Docker
participant Kubernetes
Jenkins->>GitHub: Checkout code (main branch)
Jenkins->>SonarQube: Run static code analysis (backend)
Jenkins->>SonarQube: Wait for quality gate
SonarQube-->>Jenkins: Quality gate result
Jenkins->>AWS ECR: Login (using stored credentials)
Jenkins->>Docker: Build frontend image
Jenkins->>AWS ECR: Push frontend image
Jenkins->>Docker: Build backend image
Jenkins->>AWS ECR: Push backend image
Jenkins->>Jenkins: Update image tags in deployment YAMLs
Jenkins->>Kubernetes: Create namespace (if not exists)
Jenkins->>Kubernetes: Apply manifests (DB, backend, frontend)
Estimated code review effort🎯 4 (Complex) | ⏱️ ~40 minutes Poem
Note ⚡️ Unit Test Generation is now available in beta!Learn more here, or try it out under "Finishing Touches" below. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
tesing |
|
Commit |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
jenkinsfile (2)
41-63: DRY violation: duplicated build/push logic for frontend & backend
The two stages differ only in directory and repo name. Wrap the steps in a helper (shared library) or iterate over a map to cut the boilerplate and simplify future maintenance.
13-14: Static analysis & security scanning were dropped—consider reinstating
Previous pipelines ran SonarQube, OWASP Dependency-Check and Trivy. Removing these weakens the SDLC gate and may let vulnerabilities ship untested. Recommend restoring them as parallel stages before the build/push.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (25)
Jenkins-Pipeline-Code/Jenkinsfile-Backend(0 hunks)Jenkins-Pipeline-Code/Jenkinsfile-Frontend(0 hunks)Jenkins-Server-TF/.terraform.lock.hcl(0 hunks)Jenkins-Server-TF/backend.tf(0 hunks)Jenkins-Server-TF/ec2.tf(0 hunks)Jenkins-Server-TF/gather.tf(0 hunks)Jenkins-Server-TF/iam-instance-profile.tf(0 hunks)Jenkins-Server-TF/iam-policy.tf(0 hunks)Jenkins-Server-TF/iam-role.tf(0 hunks)Jenkins-Server-TF/provider.tf(0 hunks)Jenkins-Server-TF/tools-install.sh(0 hunks)Jenkins-Server-TF/variables.tf(0 hunks)Jenkins-Server-TF/variables.tfvars(0 hunks)Jenkins-Server-TF/vpc.tf(0 hunks)Kubernetes-Manifests-file/Backend/deployment.yaml(0 hunks)Kubernetes-Manifests-file/Backend/service.yaml(0 hunks)Kubernetes-Manifests-file/Database/deployment.yaml(0 hunks)Kubernetes-Manifests-file/Database/pv.yaml(0 hunks)Kubernetes-Manifests-file/Database/pvc.yaml(0 hunks)Kubernetes-Manifests-file/Database/secrets.yaml(0 hunks)Kubernetes-Manifests-file/Database/service.yaml(0 hunks)Kubernetes-Manifests-file/Frontend/deployment.yaml(0 hunks)Kubernetes-Manifests-file/Frontend/service.yaml(0 hunks)Kubernetes-Manifests-file/ingress.yaml(0 hunks)jenkinsfile(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (24)
- Jenkins-Server-TF/iam-instance-profile.tf
- Jenkins-Server-TF/iam-policy.tf
- Jenkins-Server-TF/gather.tf
- Kubernetes-Manifests-file/Database/pv.yaml
- Kubernetes-Manifests-file/Database/secrets.yaml
- Kubernetes-Manifests-file/Database/deployment.yaml
- Jenkins-Server-TF/provider.tf
- Kubernetes-Manifests-file/Database/service.yaml
- Jenkins-Server-TF/variables.tfvars
- Jenkins-Server-TF/.terraform.lock.hcl
- Jenkins-Server-TF/ec2.tf
- Kubernetes-Manifests-file/Backend/deployment.yaml
- Jenkins-Server-TF/variables.tf
- Kubernetes-Manifests-file/Frontend/service.yaml
- Kubernetes-Manifests-file/ingress.yaml
- Kubernetes-Manifests-file/Backend/service.yaml
- Jenkins-Server-TF/backend.tf
- Jenkins-Server-TF/iam-role.tf
- Kubernetes-Manifests-file/Frontend/deployment.yaml
- Kubernetes-Manifests-file/Database/pvc.yaml
- Jenkins-Pipeline-Code/Jenkinsfile-Backend
- Jenkins-Pipeline-Code/Jenkinsfile-Frontend
- Jenkins-Server-TF/vpc.tf
- Jenkins-Server-TF/tools-install.sh
| ECR_REGISTRY = '949908266326.dkr.ecr.us-east-1.amazonaws.com' | ||
| FRONTEND_REPO = 'sukhab_app' | ||
| BACKEND_REPO = 'backend-app' | ||
| IMAGE_TAG = "latest" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Use an immutable image tag instead of the hard-coded latest
Pushing latest overwrites the previous image, making roll-backs and provenance tracking impossible. Leverage a build-specific identifier (e.g. Jenkins BUILD_NUMBER or the short Git SHA).
- IMAGE_TAG = "latest"
+ IMAGE_TAG = "${env.BUILD_NUMBER}"🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In jenkinsfile at line 9, replace the hard-coded IMAGE_TAG value "latest" with a
unique, immutable identifier such as the Jenkins BUILD_NUMBER or a short Git
SHA. This change ensures that each build produces a distinct image tag, enabling
proper roll-backs and provenance tracking. Modify the assignment to dynamically
set IMAGE_TAG using one of these build-specific variables.
| withCredentials([usernamePassword(credentialsId: 'aws-ecr-creds', usernameVariable: 'AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID', passwordVariable: 'AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY')]) { | ||
| sh ''' | ||
| mkdir -p ~/.aws | ||
|
|
||
| echo "[default]" > ~/.aws/credentials | ||
| echo "aws_access_key_id=$AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID" >> ~/.aws/credentials | ||
| echo "aws_secret_access_key=$AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY" >> ~/.aws/credentials | ||
|
|
||
| echo "[default]" > ~/.aws/config | ||
| echo "region=$AWS_REGION" >> ~/.aws/config | ||
|
|
||
| aws ecr get-login-password --region $AWS_REGION | docker login --username AWS --password-stdin $ECR_REGISTRY |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Credentials leakage: secrets are written to disk and survive the build
echo-ing keys into ~/.aws/credentials leaves permanent artefacts on the agent workspace and risks exfiltration via artefact archiving or a compromised node. Use in-memory env-vars only, or delete the file immediately after use.
- mkdir -p ~/.aws
- echo "[default]" > ~/.aws/credentials
- echo "aws_access_key_id=$AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID" >> ~/.aws/credentials
- echo "aws_secret_access_key=$AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY" >> ~/.aws/credentials
- ...
+ export AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID=${AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID}
+ export AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY=${AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY}
+ export AWS_DEFAULT_REGION=${AWS_REGION}
+
+ # Skip file materialisation entirely
+ aws ecr get-login-password --region $AWS_REGION | \
+ docker login --username AWS --password-stdin $ECR_REGISTRYAt minimum, append rm -rf ~/.aws after the login step.
Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In the jenkinsfile around lines 24 to 35, AWS credentials are written to disk in
~/.aws/credentials and ~/.aws/config, which risks credential leakage. To fix
this, avoid persisting these files by deleting the ~/.aws directory immediately
after the docker login step using 'rm -rf ~/.aws'. This ensures credentials do
not remain on disk after use.
| stage('Update Deployment YAMLs with Image') { | ||
| steps { | ||
| sh """ | ||
| sed -i 's|image:.*|image: ${ECR_REGISTRY}/${BACKEND_REPO}:${IMAGE_TAG}|' Kubernetes-Manifests-file/Backend/deployment.yaml | ||
| sed -i 's|image:.*|image: ${ECR_REGISTRY}/${FRONTEND_REPO}:${IMAGE_TAG}|' Kubernetes-Manifests-file/Frontend/deployment.yaml | ||
| """ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
sed 's|image:.*|…|' is too greedy and can corrupt the manifest
The pattern matches the first image: token it sees—potentially imagePullPolicy: or a side-car container image—leading to broken YAML. Prefer a YAML-aware tool (e.g. yq) or anchor the regex:
- sed -i 's|image:.*|image: ${ECR_REGISTRY}/${BACKEND_REPO}:${IMAGE_TAG}|' Kubernetes-Manifests-file/Backend/deployment.yaml
+ yq -i '.spec.template.spec.containers[0].image = "'"${ECR_REGISTRY}/${BACKEND_REPO}:${IMAGE_TAG}"'"' \
+ Kubernetes-Manifests-file/Backend/deployment.yamlSame applies to the frontend line.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| stage('Update Deployment YAMLs with Image') { | |
| steps { | |
| sh """ | |
| sed -i 's|image:.*|image: ${ECR_REGISTRY}/${BACKEND_REPO}:${IMAGE_TAG}|' Kubernetes-Manifests-file/Backend/deployment.yaml | |
| sed -i 's|image:.*|image: ${ECR_REGISTRY}/${FRONTEND_REPO}:${IMAGE_TAG}|' Kubernetes-Manifests-file/Frontend/deployment.yaml | |
| """ | |
| stage('Update Deployment YAMLs with Image') { | |
| steps { | |
| sh """ | |
| - sed -i 's|image:.*|image: ${ECR_REGISTRY}/${BACKEND_REPO}:${IMAGE_TAG}|' Kubernetes-Manifests-file/Backend/deployment.yaml | |
| + yq -i '.spec.template.spec.containers[0].image = "'"${ECR_REGISTRY}/${BACKEND_REPO}:${IMAGE_TAG}"'"' \ | |
| + Kubernetes-Manifests-file/Backend/deployment.yaml | |
| - sed -i 's|image:.*|image: ${ECR_REGISTRY}/${FRONTEND_REPO}:${IMAGE_TAG}|' Kubernetes-Manifests-file/Frontend/deployment.yaml | |
| + yq -i '.spec.template.spec.containers[0].image = "'"${ECR_REGISTRY}/${FRONTEND_REPO}:${IMAGE_TAG}"'"' \ | |
| + Kubernetes-Manifests-file/Frontend/deployment.yaml | |
| """ | |
| } | |
| } |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In jenkinsfile around lines 65 to 70, the sed commands use a greedy regex that
can mistakenly replace unintended lines like imagePullPolicy or sidecar images,
corrupting the YAML manifests. To fix this, replace the sed commands with a
YAML-aware tool such as yq to update only the container image fields, or modify
the regex to anchor it specifically to the container image lines to avoid
matching other keys. Apply this fix to both backend and frontend deployment.yaml
updates.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🔭 Outside diff range comments (2)
Kubernetes-Manifests-file/Backend/deployment.yaml (1)
24-30: Harden the container with an explicitsecurityContextStatic-analysis (CKV_K8S_20 & 23) flags the container for potentially running as root and allowing privilege escalation. Add a
securityContextto eliminate these risks and satisfy the checks.containers: - name: api image: 407622020962.dkr.ecr.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/backend:latest imagePullPolicy: Always + securityContext: + allowPrivilegeEscalation: false + runAsNonRoot: true + capabilities: + drop: ["ALL"]Kubernetes-Manifests-file /Database/deployment.yaml (1)
15-28: Add asecurityContextto drop root privileges & disable privilege escalationStatic-analysis (CKV_K8S_20, CKV_K8S_23) correctly warns that the container may run as root and allow privilege escalation. Hardening the pod is critical for a database workload that will inevitably handle production data.
containers: - name: mon image: mongo:4.4.6 + securityContext: + runAsNonRoot: true + runAsUser: 999 # non-root UID in the image + allowPrivilegeEscalation: false + capabilities: + drop: + - ALLThis small change satisfies both CVE scanners and most organisational Kubernetes baselines.
Also applies to: 40-46
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
Kubernetes-Manifests-file/Backend/deployment.yaml (2)
55-58:successThreshold: 1can be omitted – it’s already the defaultKubernetes defaults
readinessProbe.successThresholdto1, so explicitly setting it adds noise without changing behaviour.
26-30: Consider defining resource requests/limits for predictable schedulingThe pod has no CPU/memory requests or limits, so it may be over-provisioned or throttled unexpectedly. Defining them improves cluster stability and enables HPA/cluster-autoscaler to work correctly.
imagePullPolicy: Always + resources: + requests: + cpu: "100m" + memory: "128Mi" + limits: + cpu: "250m" + memory: "256Mi"Kubernetes-Manifests-file /Database/deployment.yaml (1)
6-12: Consider using a StatefulSet for MongoDB instead of a DeploymentDatabases require stable network identities and persistent storage. A
Deploymentre-creates pods with new names/IPs, which can break replica sets or external clients. AStatefulSetgives each replica a predictable, sticky identity (mongodb-0,mongodb-1, …) and mounts its PVC by ordinal, which is the de-facto pattern for single-node or clustered Mongo.If zero-downtime upgrades, rolling restarts, or future horizontal scaling are in scope, migrating to a
StatefulSetnow will save effort later.Also applies to: 41-46
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
Kubernetes-Manifests-file /Database/deployment.yaml(1 hunks)Kubernetes-Manifests-file /Database/pv.yaml(1 hunks)Kubernetes-Manifests-file /Database/pvc.yaml(1 hunks)Kubernetes-Manifests-file /Database/secrets.yaml(1 hunks)Kubernetes-Manifests-file /Database/service.yaml(1 hunks)Kubernetes-Manifests-file/Backend/deployment.yaml(1 hunks)Kubernetes-Manifests-file/Backend/service.yaml(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (5)
- Kubernetes-Manifests-file /Database/pv.yaml
- Kubernetes-Manifests-file /Database/service.yaml
- Kubernetes-Manifests-file /Database/secrets.yaml
- Kubernetes-Manifests-file/Backend/service.yaml
- Kubernetes-Manifests-file /Database/pvc.yaml
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Checkov (3.2.334)
Kubernetes-Manifests-file /Database/deployment.yaml
[MEDIUM] 1-46: Containers should not run with allowPrivilegeEscalation
(CKV_K8S_20)
[MEDIUM] 1-46: Minimize the admission of root containers
(CKV_K8S_23)
Kubernetes-Manifests-file/Backend/deployment.yaml
[MEDIUM] 1-57: Containers should not run with allowPrivilegeEscalation
(CKV_K8S_20)
[MEDIUM] 1-57: Minimize the admission of root containers
(CKV_K8S_23)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
Kubernetes-Manifests-file /Database/deployment.yaml (2)
46-47: No functional impact – newline onlyThe only change in this hunk is the trailing newline after
claimName: mongo-volume-claim.
No action required.
41-46: Verify PVC name & namespace alignment
claimName: mongo-volume-claimpresumes aPersistentVolumeClaimof that name exists in the same namespace (three-tier). Double-check the PVC manifest (pv.yaml/pvc.yaml) is namespaced identically; otherwise the pod will remain inPendingdue toClaimNotFound.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
Kubernetes-Manifests-file/Frontend/deployment.yaml (1)
24-34: Add a securityContext to drop root and disable privilege escalationStatic-analysis flags (CKV_K8S_20 / CKV_K8S_23) indicate the container may run as root with
allowPrivilegeEscalation=trueby default. Harden the pod by explicitly setting asecurityContext.containers: - name: frontend image: 407622020962.dkr.ecr.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/frontend:latest imagePullPolicy: Always + securityContext: + runAsNonRoot: true + allowPrivilegeEscalation: false + capabilities: + drop: ["ALL"]
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
Kubernetes-Manifests-file/Frontend/deployment.yaml (1)
24-34: Define resource requests/limits to prevent noisy-neighbor issuesThe container section lacks
resources. Without them, the scheduler can overcommit nodes and OOM-kill your pod.imagePullPolicy: Always env: - name: REACT_APP_BACKEND_URL value: "http://backend.amanpathakdevops.study/api/tasks" ports: - containerPort: 3000 + resources: + requests: + cpu: "100m" + memory: "128Mi" + limits: + cpu: "250m" + memory: "256Mi"Kubernetes-Manifests-file/Database/deployment.yaml (1)
46-46: No securityContext – pod runs as root & may escalate privileges
The file change is only a newline, but Checkov flags CKV_K8S_20 / 23: containers can run as root and allow privilege escalation. Harden the Deployment before merging.Suggested patch (indentation aligned with
containers:list):ports: - containerPort: 27017 + securityContext: + runAsNonRoot: true + runAsUser: 999 # non-root UID + allowPrivilegeEscalation: false + readOnlyRootFilesystem: truePlease verify that the MongoDB image functions correctly with non-root UID
999(override if necessary) and update cluster PSP/OPA policies accordingly.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
Kubernetes-Manifests-file/Database/deployment.yaml(1 hunks)Kubernetes-Manifests-file/Database/pv.yaml(1 hunks)Kubernetes-Manifests-file/Database/pvc.yaml(1 hunks)Kubernetes-Manifests-file/Database/secrets.yaml(1 hunks)Kubernetes-Manifests-file/Database/service.yaml(1 hunks)Kubernetes-Manifests-file/Frontend/deployment.yaml(1 hunks)Kubernetes-Manifests-file/Frontend/service.yaml(1 hunks)jenkinsfile(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
- Kubernetes-Manifests-file/Database/pv.yaml
- Kubernetes-Manifests-file/Database/pvc.yaml
- Kubernetes-Manifests-file/Database/service.yaml
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- Kubernetes-Manifests-file/Frontend/service.yaml
- jenkinsfile
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Checkov (3.2.334)
Kubernetes-Manifests-file/Database/deployment.yaml
[MEDIUM] 1-46: Containers should not run with allowPrivilegeEscalation
(CKV_K8S_20)
[MEDIUM] 1-46: Minimize the admission of root containers
(CKV_K8S_23)
Kubernetes-Manifests-file/Frontend/deployment.yaml
[MEDIUM] 1-34: Containers should not run with allowPrivilegeEscalation
(CKV_K8S_20)
[MEDIUM] 1-34: Minimize the admission of root containers
(CKV_K8S_23)
🪛 Gitleaks (8.27.2)
Kubernetes-Manifests-file/Database/secrets.yaml
8-8: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
🪛 YAMLlint (1.37.1)
Kubernetes-Manifests-file/Database/secrets.yaml
[error] 8-8: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 9-9: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
Kubernetes-Manifests-file/Frontend/deployment.yaml (2)
28-29: Avoid thelatesttag to guarantee reproducible rollbacksPinning to
:latestmakes rollbacks and diff-based deploys non-deterministic. If the Jenkinsfile rewrites the tag dynamically, prefer a semver or SHA digest and keeplatestonly for local testing.Example:
- image: 407622020962.dkr.ecr.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/frontend:latest + image: 407622020962.dkr.ecr.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/frontend:${BUILD_TAG}
30-32: Confirm the backend URL is reachable inside the cluster
REACT_APP_BACKEND_URLreferences an external hostname over HTTP. If the intention is intra-cluster communication, consider using the Kubernetes service DNS (http://backend.three-tier.svc.cluster.local) or expose the backend via an Ingress to avoid hair-pinning traffic outside the cluster.
| password: cGFzc3dvcmQxMjM= | ||
| username: YWRtaW4= |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Hard-coded credentials in VCS & YAML-lint violations
Committing base-64 credentials (password, username) directly to the repo is a leak-vector (anyone can decode them). In addition, both lines end with trailing spaces, causing YAML-lint errors.
Action items
- Rotate the exposed MongoDB credentials immediately.
- Move secrets to a safer mechanism ( SealedSecrets, External-Secrets, AWS Secrets Manager, etc.) and commit the encrypted or template manifest instead.
- Remove trailing spaces:
- password: cGFzc3dvcmQxMjM=
- username: YWRtaW4=
+ password: cGFzc3dvcmQxMjM=
+ username: YWRtaW4=📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| password: cGFzc3dvcmQxMjM= | |
| username: YWRtaW4= | |
| password: cGFzc3dvcmQxMjM= | |
| username: YWRtaW4= |
🧰 Tools
🪛 Gitleaks (8.27.2)
8-8: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
🪛 YAMLlint (1.37.1)
[error] 8-8: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 9-9: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In Kubernetes-Manifests-file/Database/secrets.yaml at lines 8 to 9, the
base64-encoded credentials are hard-coded and have trailing spaces causing
YAML-lint errors. Immediately rotate these MongoDB credentials to invalidate the
exposed ones. Remove the trailing spaces at the end of both lines to fix the
YAML-lint issues. Replace the hard-coded secrets by moving them to a secure
secrets management system like SealedSecrets, External-Secrets, or AWS Secrets
Manager, and commit only the encrypted or templated manifest instead of raw
credentials.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
♻️ Duplicate comments (3)
jenkinsfile (3)
8-10: Use immutable image tags – avoidlatest.
Tagging every build aslatestmakes roll-backs impossible and breaks provenance. Prefer${BUILD_NUMBER},git rev-parse --short HEAD, or similar.
47-55: Credentials leak – secrets written to disk.
Persisting AWS keys in~/.aws/credentialsleaves them on the agent after the job; a compromised node or artefact archive can exfiltrate them. Use env-vars only or delete the directory immediately.
88-91:sed 's|image:.*|…|'is overly greedy – can corrupt YAML.
Switch to a YAML-aware tool (yq) or tighten the pattern to affect only the first container image line; otherwise you risk clobberingimagePullPolicy:or side-cars.
| // ✅ NEW STAGE | ||
| stage('SonarQube Analysis') { | ||
| steps { | ||
| dir('Application-Code/backend') { | ||
| withSonarQubeEnv('MySonarQube') { | ||
| sh """ | ||
| sonar-scanner \ | ||
| -Dsonar.projectKey=$SONAR_PROJECT_KEY \ | ||
| -Dsonar.sources=. \ | ||
| -Dsonar.host.url=http://localhost:9000 \ | ||
| -Dsonar.login=$SONAR_TOKEN | ||
| """ | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Sonar stage needs a quality-gate check and must not hard-code the host URL.
withSonarQubeEnv already injects SONAR_HOST_URL and an auth token. Hard-coding http://localhost:9000 and re-passing -Dsonar.login defeats that indirection and leaks the secret in logs.
Also, without waitForQualityGate abortPipeline: true, the build proceeds even if the analysis fails, nullifying the point of static analysis.
- withSonarQubeEnv('MySonarQube') {
- sh """
- sonar-scanner \
- -Dsonar.projectKey=$SONAR_PROJECT_KEY \
- -Dsonar.sources=. \
- -Dsonar.host.url=http://localhost:9000 \
- -Dsonar.login=$SONAR_TOKEN
- """
- }
+ withSonarQubeEnv('MySonarQube') {
+ sh """
+ sonar-scanner \
+ -Dsonar.projectKey=$SONAR_PROJECT_KEY \
+ -Dsonar.sources=.
+ """
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ stage('SonarQube Quality Gate') {
+ steps {
+ timeout(time: 10, unit: 'MINUTES') {
+ waitForQualityGate abortPipeline: true
}
}
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| // ✅ NEW STAGE | |
| stage('SonarQube Analysis') { | |
| steps { | |
| dir('Application-Code/backend') { | |
| withSonarQubeEnv('MySonarQube') { | |
| sh """ | |
| sonar-scanner \ | |
| -Dsonar.projectKey=$SONAR_PROJECT_KEY \ | |
| -Dsonar.sources=. \ | |
| -Dsonar.host.url=http://localhost:9000 \ | |
| -Dsonar.login=$SONAR_TOKEN | |
| """ | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } | |
| // ✅ NEW STAGE | |
| stage('SonarQube Analysis') { | |
| steps { | |
| dir('Application-Code/backend') { | |
| withSonarQubeEnv('MySonarQube') { | |
| sh """ | |
| sonar-scanner \ | |
| -Dsonar.projectKey=$SONAR_PROJECT_KEY \ | |
| -Dsonar.sources=. | |
| """ | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } | |
| stage('SonarQube Quality Gate') { | |
| steps { | |
| timeout(time: 10, unit: 'MINUTES') { | |
| waitForQualityGate abortPipeline: true | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In the jenkinsfile between lines 25 and 40, remove the hard-coded sonar.host.url
and sonar.login parameters from the sonar-scanner command since withSonarQubeEnv
already sets SONAR_HOST_URL and authentication. Add a post-analysis step using
waitForQualityGate abortPipeline: true to ensure the pipeline fails if the
SonarQube quality gate is not passed, preventing the build from continuing on
failed analysis.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Chores
Style