Platform yaml

[uramirez8707]

Describe your changes

Updates code to allow for platform yaml to contain reusable variable that can be used in the compile yaml.

Issue ticket number and link (if applicable)

Fixes #681

Checklist before requesting a review

• I ran my code
• I tried to make my code readable
• I tried to comment my code
• I wrote a new test, if applicable
• I wrote new instructions/documentation, if applicable
• I ran pytest and inspected it's output
• I ran pylint and attempted to implement some of it's feedback
• No print statements; all user-facing info uses logging module

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 83.33333% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 85.31%. Comparing base (ebc2b0b) to head (2b6a84b).

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
fre/yamltools/helpers.py	80.00%	1 Missing ⚠️
fre/yamltools/info_parsers/compile_info_parser.py	85.71%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #682      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   85.32%   85.31%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          68       68              
  Lines        4490     4495       +5     
==========================================
+ Hits         3831     3835       +4     
- Misses        659      660       +1     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	85.31% <83.33%> (-0.01%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[singhd789]

Dropping a test like this into test_helpers.py might help out the code coverage report:

def test_yaml_clean():
    input_yaml = {
                  "name": "test"
                  "platform": "ptest"
                  "target": "ttest"
                  "fre_properties": ["some", "list"]
                  "build": {"compile": "yaml1", "platform": "yaml2"}
                  "experiments": ["some", "list"]
                  "compile": {"info": "info1"}
                  "platforms": [{"name": "plat1"},
                                {"name": "plat2", "fre_properties": ["another", "list"]}]
                 }

    # After cleaning - yaml should look like this
    expected_yaml = {
                     "name": "test"
                     "platform": "ptest"
                     "target": "ttest"
                     "compile": {"info": "info1"}
                     "platforms": [{"name": "plat1"},
                                   {"name": "plat2"}]
                    }

    # Clean yaml
    output_yaml = clean_yaml(input_yaml)

    assert output_yaml == expected_yaml

[singhd789]

Though not necessary, it might be nice to have the functions in the class above follow how the yamls are combined here, which means 2 changes:

1. Just switching the order of the functions around in InitCompileYaml in this file
2. Switching around the order that class follows in abstract_classes.py