Integrated support of WSS transport using libwebsocket

[neutrino38]

Adding support of SIP over WSS based on libwebsocket

[Javdu10]

Hello there!

Great work, it would be very nice if we could somehow change the ws ccinfo.path (For example I have /ws on my side) aswell as be able to use flags like LCCSCF_ALLOW_SELFSIGNED, LCCSCF_ALLOW_INSECURE, LCCSCF_SKIP_SERVER_CERT_HOSTNAME_CHECK

[neutrino38]

Hello there!

Great work, it would be very nice if we could somehow change the ws ccinfo.path (For example I have /ws on my side) aswell as be able to use flags like LCCSCF_ALLOW_SELFSIGNED, LCCSCF_ALLOW_INSECURE, LCCSCF_SKIP_SERVER_CERT_HOSTNAME_CHECK

regarding the ccinfo.path, how would you specify that in the sipp scenario?
regarding the flags, do you want me to add options to the command line? I'll check how it's done with TLS.

[Javdu10]

Hello there!
Great work, it would be very nice if we could somehow change the ws ccinfo.path (For example I have /ws on my side) aswell as be able to use flags like LCCSCF_ALLOW_SELFSIGNED, LCCSCF_ALLOW_INSECURE, LCCSCF_SKIP_SERVER_CERT_HOSTNAME_CHECK

regarding the ccinfo.path, how would you specify that in the sipp scenario? regarding the flags, do you want me to add options to the command line? I'll check how it's done with TLS.

Hello!

I think it must be a command argument next to where we specify the transport layer for websocket

if not used, something like -wp or -wsp for short args and --ws-path for longer version would probably do

Other than that it works nicely, thanks!

[neutrino38]

I added LCCSCF_ALLOW_SELFSIGNED and LCCSCF_ALLOW_INSECURE flags to the ccinfo and added a -wss_path option to the command line. I could not find any definition of LCCSCF_SKIP_SERVER_CERT_HOSTNAME_CHECK however.

[orgads]

Thanks for the contribution!

Can you suggest a way to (manually) test this?

[neutrino38]

Hello,

It can be tested with an UAC like scenario against an asterisk software configured to handle WebRTC calls.

[orgads]

@neutrino38 Please fix the lint issues.

[orgads]

@lemenkov Can you please review this?

[lemenkov]

@lemenkov Can you please review this?

I'm on it