Skip to content

Conversation

@a1q123456
Copy link
Collaborator

High Level Overview of Change

Context of Change

Type of Change

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • Refactor (non-breaking change that only restructures code)
  • Performance (increase or change in throughput and/or latency)
  • Tests (you added tests for code that already exists, or your new feature included in this PR)
  • Documentation update
  • Chore (no impact to binary, e.g. .gitignore, formatting, dropping support for older tooling)
  • Release

API Impact

  • Public API: New feature (new methods and/or new fields)
  • Public API: Breaking change (in general, breaking changes should only impact the next api_version)
  • libxrpl change (any change that may affect libxrpl or dependents of libxrpl)
  • Peer protocol change (must be backward compatible or bump the peer protocol version)

@a1q123456 a1q123456 requested a review from a team as a code owner November 14, 2025 10:02
@a1q123456 a1q123456 requested review from vvysokikh1 and ximinez and removed request for a team November 14, 2025 10:02
@a1q123456
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Adding @ximinez and @Bronek as it's related to Lending Protocol changes.

@a1q123456 a1q123456 requested a review from Bronek November 14, 2025 10:03
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 14, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 78.6%. Comparing base (508937f) to head (6db8845).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop   #6035     +/-   ##
=========================================
- Coverage     78.6%   78.6%   -0.0%     
=========================================
  Files          817     817             
  Lines        68985   68970     -15     
  Branches      8239    8241      +2     
=========================================
- Hits         54204   54187     -17     
- Misses       14781   14783      +2     
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
include/xrpl/protocol/STTx.h 100.0% <ø> (ø)
src/libxrpl/protocol/STTx.cpp 88.0% <100.0%> (-0.4%) ⬇️
src/xrpld/app/tx/detail/Batch.cpp 98.2% <100.0%> (-<0.1%) ⬇️
src/xrpld/app/tx/detail/apply.cpp 92.6% <100.0%> (-0.2%) ⬇️

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes

Impacted file tree graph

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@vvysokikh1
Copy link
Collaborator

@a1q123456 I see that there's some cleanup still required in PublicKey.h/.cpp, namely verify and verifyDigest. Or do they still need that parameter?

@a1q123456
Copy link
Collaborator Author

verify

Wasn't very sure if we'll need that in the future but happy to clean them up.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants