chore: fix lychee

[nealvaidya]

Overview:

Details:

Lychee is failing. This fixes.

Where should the reviewer start?

Related Issues: (use one of the action keywords Closes / Fixes / Resolves / Relates to)

• closes GitHub issue: #xxx

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores

  • Updated URL filtering patterns to exclude test data references while restoring file URL handling.

• Documentation

  • Updated documentation reference URL to reflect new location.

_{✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.}

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The PR restores a file:// URL ignore pattern in .lycheeignore and adds exclusion for test data paths, while updating a Mooncake documentation reference URL in the architecture design document from a blob path to a design HTML path.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Change Summary
Linting Configuration \.lycheeignore	Restored ^file:// ignore pattern and added .*tests/data.* pattern to exclude URLs within test data directories
Documentation docs/design_docs/architecture.md	Updated Mooncake reference URL from Mooncake/blob/main/doc/en/mooncake-store.md to Mooncake/design/mooncake-store.html

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

• Both changes are straightforward pattern/URL updates with no logic alterations
• No dependencies or cross-file impacts identified

Poem

🐰 Patterns restored, links renewed,
URLs hop to their new perch,
Tests and files in harmony brew,
Documentation takes its lurch! ✨

Pre-merge checks

❌ Failed checks (1 warning, 1 inconclusive)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Description check	⚠️ Warning	The description is largely incomplete with placeholder text. The 'Overview' and 'Where should the reviewer start?' sections are empty, and 'Related Issues' still contains the template placeholder '#xxx' without a real issue number.	Fill in the Overview section, specify which files reviewers should examine, provide concrete issue numbers, and explain what Lychee failures were fixed and how.
Title check	❓ Inconclusive	The title 'chore: fix lychee' is vague and generic, using the non-descriptive term 'fix' without explaining what aspect of lychee was fixed or why.	Replace with a more specific title that describes the actual changes, such as 'chore: fix lychee configuration for broken links' or similar.

✅ Passed checks (1 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 29ec496 and a3a25b5.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• .lycheeignore (1 hunks)
• docs/design_docs/architecture.md (1 hunks)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)

• GitHub Check: Build and Test - dynamo

🔇 Additional comments (2)

.lycheeignore (1)

1-5: LGTM!

The Lychee ignore patterns are correctly formatted. The restoration of the ^file:// pattern and addition of .*tests/data.* are sensible exclusions for a link checker configuration—local file references and test fixtures are typically not meant to be validated by external link checkers.

docs/design_docs/architecture.md (1)

43-43: The updated Mooncake URL (https://kvcache-ai.github.io/Mooncake/design/mooncake-store.html) is valid and accessible, pointing to active documentation about the Mooncake Store design for KV cache management. The link correctly supports the reference in the architecture documentation.

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}