Add MseeP.ai badge

[lwsinclair]

Hi there,

This pull request shares a security update on mcp-server-browserbase.

We also have an entry for mcp-server-browserbase in our directory, MseeP.ai, where we provide regular security and trust updates on your app.

We invite you to add our badge for your MCP server to your README to help your users learn from a third party that provides ongoing validation of mcp-server-browserbase.

You can easily take control over your listing for free: visit it at https://mseep.ai/app/browserbase-mcp-server-browserbase.

Yours Sincerely,

Lawrence W. Sinclair
CEO/SkyDeck AI
Founder of MseeP.ai
MCP servers you can trust

---

Here are our latest evaluation results of mcp-server-browserbase

Security Scan Results

Security Score: 100/100

Risk Level: low

Scan Date: 2025-06-13

Score starts at 100, deducts points for security issues, and adds points for security best practices

This security assessment was conducted by MseeP.ai, an independent security validation service for MCP servers. Visit our website to learn more about our security reviews.

[greptile-apps]

Greptile Summary

This PR proposes adding a MseeP.ai security badge to the README.md file. The badge claims to provide third-party security validation for the MCP server with a perfect 100/100 security score. While having third-party security validation could be valuable, there are several concerns with this change:

1. The badge is being placed at the very top of the README, before the project title, which disrupts the document hierarchy
2. MseeP.ai appears to be a new service (domain registered recently) without established credibility in the security assessment space
3. The perfect security score (100/100) was generated without any apparent collaboration or access to our codebase
4. The badge image is hosted on mseep.net while the service is on mseep.ai, raising potential concerns about domain consistency
5. This appears to be a marketing initiative from MseeP.ai rather than a requested security assessment

PR Description Notes:

• The PR description focuses heavily on marketing language rather than technical details about the security assessment methodology
• No information is provided about the specific security checks performed
• No details about how the continuous validation process works

Confidence score: 1/5

1. This PR requires significant scrutiny before considering merge
2. Score is low due to security concerns about adding an unverified third-party badge and potential risks of linking to external domains without proper vetting
3. README.md needs careful review, particularly regarding badge placement and the legitimacy of the security claims

_{1 file reviewed, no comments
Edit PR Review Bot Settings | Greptile}