Skip to content

Conversation

@sam33rch
Copy link

@sam33rch sam33rch commented Feb 4, 2017

This commit adds S3 Client Side Encryption support to spark-redshfit library that allows
full end-to-end data encryption over network for read/write operations.

This commit adds S3 Client Side Encryption support to spark-redshfit library that allows
full end-to-end data encryption over network for read/write operations.
@danielsan
Copy link

This is a good one

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Jul 26, 2017

Agreed. We need this PR merged

@dedgsus
Copy link

dedgsus commented Sep 27, 2017

Another +1. Super useful feature.

@guruswan
Copy link

+1. Very useful feature.

@szsiddiq
Copy link

szsiddiq commented Feb 8, 2018

+1 This is a great feature - what's keeping it from being merged?

@twwildey
Copy link

+1 for this feature!

@rumeshkrish
Copy link

rumeshkrish commented Jun 11, 2020

Would it possible to add support for KMS_KEY_ID option in UNLOAD command ?

Documentation : https://docs.aws.amazon.com/redshift/latest/dg/t_unloading_encrypted_files.html

Example:

    unload ('select venuename, venuecity from venue')
    to 's3://mybucket/encrypted/venue_' 
    iam_role 'arn:aws:iam::0123456789012:role/MyRedshiftRole'
    KMS_KEY_ID '1234abcd-12ab-34cd-56ef-1234567890ab'
    encrypted;

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants