Skip to content

Comments

#9276- Literals should not be used for promise rejection #9276iterals should not be used for promise rejection #9277

Open
oguzhanduran wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
9276-literals-should-not-be-used-for-promise-rejection
Open

#9276- Literals should not be used for promise rejection #9276iterals should not be used for promise rejection #9277
oguzhanduran wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
9276-literals-should-not-be-used-for-promise-rejection

Conversation

@oguzhanduran
Copy link
Collaborator

How the feature works? / How did you fix the issue?

(Screenshots, videos, or GIFs, if applicable)

Check list

  • unit-tests written
  • e2e-tests written
  • documentation updated
  • PR name follows the pattern #1234 – issue name
  • branch name doesn't contain '#'
  • PR is linked with the issue
  • base branch (master or release/xx) is correct
  • task status changed to "Code review"
  • reviewers are notified about the pull request

Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI commented Feb 20, 2026

@oguzhanduran I've opened a new pull request, #9285, to work on those changes. Once the pull request is ready, I'll request review from you.

@oguzhanduran oguzhanduran force-pushed the 9276-literals-should-not-be-used-for-promise-rejection branch from 23898d0 to 84b864a Compare February 23, 2026 05:36
@oguzhanduran oguzhanduran force-pushed the 9276-literals-should-not-be-used-for-promise-rejection branch from 84b864a to e3168f4 Compare February 23, 2026 14:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Refactor: (TypeScript) Literals should not be used for promise rejection

2 participants