Skip to content

Conversation

@haheihou5
Copy link

@haheihou5 haheihou5 commented Oct 21, 2025

Fil+ Improvement Suggestions 2025

1.The authority of notaries will be transferred to the DC-issued platform, which can be rebuilt or modified by referencing the data distribution platform https://console.filswan.com/ of the Filswan project, until the complete elimination of fil+. Then, the ratio of DC's computing power to CC's will be entirely determined by market forces.

1 回收公证人权力至dc发放的平台,此发放平台可以参照 filswan项目的数据发放平台 https://console.filswan.com/ 来重建或修改 ,直到完全取消fil+,到时dc 的算力和cc算力比例,将完全由市场自行调整

2 The ban on notaries selling or authorizing DC quotas outside the platform, coupled with miners' reluctance to purchase DC data due to cost concerns and their unwillingness to expand computing capacity because of communication costs, makes this system detrimental to the entire ecosystem.
2 禁止公证人在平台外出售,或授权dc额度;矿工会因为成本问题而拒绝购买dc数据或因为沟通成本而放弃扩大算力规模,所以这个制度对整个生态我认为是有害的。

3 Reduce the fil+ multiplier from X10 to X5 or even X3 to narrow the gap between cc miners, allowing them to temporarily adjust their computational power using cc sectors. This is because the cc generator and the random number generators used by some computational power notaries appear fundamentally identical.

3 将 fil+ 乘数从X10 降低至X5 甚至X3,用以缩小cc矿工的差距,使得矿工也能使用cc扇区来短时间调整自己的算力,因为cc生成器,和某些出售算力的公证人使用的随机数生成器似乎本质上没有区别

Fil+ Improvement Suggestions 2025
Copy link
Member

@rvagg rvagg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@haheihou5 thanks for the contribution, and I'd love to be able to move this forward, but this isn't a proper FIP. You need to work a bit harder on making a concrete proposal here that can be turned into actions in code to drive the consensus mechanism. The outcome of a FIP should be a change in the system. Someone should be able to take a FIP, turn it into code, have it deployed in a network upgrade and the text of the FIP be sufficient to describe what was done, why it was done, and any surrounding concerns about the change.

As it is, this contribution is not something we can consider for merging simply on the grounds that it's not yet a FIP. I understand there's frustrations about the FIL+ system driving this FIP, and I know there are plenty of people that have similar frustrations. Can I suggest you find others to draft a complete proposal that can be merged as a FIP and properly considered. A good way to proceed in finding others to work with is to open a discussion thread @ https://github.com/filecoin-project/FIPs/discussions and with other interested parties to form a fuller proposal, try to iron out problems that come up (economic changes are far from simple, there will be problems to iron out), then come back here with that proposal in FIP form. Much of the text you have in here is really discussion pointers that belong over there first.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants