test(operations): add Ginkgo test suite for operations package #5418
Conversation
Signed-off-by: adity1raut <[email protected]>
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Summary of ChangesHello @adity1raut, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request significantly refactors the unit tests within the Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
|
Hi @adity1raut. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a fluid-cloudnative member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request refactors the tests for ThinFileUtils to use the Ginkgo BDD framework, replacing the previous implementation that used the standard testing package. The new tests are well-structured, more comprehensive, and significantly improve readability and maintainability. I have a couple of suggestions: one to correct the test suite package name to ensure it functions correctly, and another to improve consistency within the test code. Overall, this is a valuable improvement to the project's test suite.
Signed-off-by: adity1raut <[email protected]>
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #5418 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 57.46% 56.16% -1.31%
==========================================
Files 443 443
Lines 30735 30735
==========================================
- Hits 17661 17261 -400
- Misses 11460 11912 +452
+ Partials 1614 1562 -52 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
Signed-off-by: adity1raut <[email protected]>
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
This pull request migrates the operations package test suite from standard Go testing to the Ginkgo/Gomega testing framework, which is part of a broader effort tracked in issue #5407.
Changes:
- Added a new Ginkgo test suite entry point for the operations package
- Converted existing tests from standard Go testing functions to Ginkgo Describe/Context/It style
- Expanded test coverage with additional edge cases for path handling, output formats, and error conditions
Reviewed changes
Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 3 comments.
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| pkg/ddc/thin/operations/operations_suite_test.go | New Ginkgo test suite entry point for running all operations tests |
| pkg/ddc/thin/operations/base_test.go | Converted all existing tests from standard Go testing to Ginkgo style with expanded test coverage |
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
| @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ | |||
| package operations_test | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Package naming inconsistency: the test suite file uses package operations_test while base_test.go uses package operations. Since base_test.go accesses unexported fields of ThinFileUtils (podName, namespace, container, log), both files should use the same package name. Change this file to use package operations to match base_test.go.
| package operations_test | |
| package operations |
1 participant
Ⅰ. Describe what this PR does
Ⅱ. Does this pull request fix one issue?
part of #5407
Ⅲ. List the added test cases (unit test/integration test) if any, please explain if no tests are needed.
Ⅳ. Describe how to verify it
Ⅴ. Special notes for reviews