test(recover): refactor tests to use Ginkgo for better structure and readability

[adity1raut]

Ⅰ. Describe what this PR does

• Add unit tests for FuseRecover functionality and environment variable handling

• Introduced a new test suite for the FuseRecover package in recover_suite_test.go.

• Converted existing tests in recover_test.go to use Ginkgo and Gomega for better readability and structure.

• Added tests for various scenarios in the FuseRecover logic, including kubelet client initialization, recovery processes, and event recording.

• Created a new register_test.go file to test the Enabled function based on NODEPUBLISH_METHOD and feature gates.

• Ensured that tests cover different configurations of NODEPUBLISH_METHOD and the FuseRecovery feature.

Ⅱ. Does this pull request fix one issue?

Part of #5407

Ⅲ. List the added test cases (unit test/integration test) if any, please explain if no tests are needed.

Ⅳ. Describe how to verify it

Ⅴ. Special notes for reviews

[fluid-e2e-bot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign cheyang for approval by writing /assign @cheyang in a comment. For more information see:The Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello @adity1raut, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request significantly enhances the test suite for the FuseRecover package by migrating its unit tests to the Ginkgo and Gomega frameworks. This transition provides a more organized and expressive testing style, making tests easier to understand and maintain. Concurrently, it expands the test coverage for critical components of the Fuse recovery mechanism, ensuring robustness and correct behavior under various configurations and scenarios.

Highlights

• Test Framework Migration: Refactored existing unit tests in pkg/csi/recover/recover_test.go from goconvey to Ginkgo and Gomega for improved structure and readability.
• New Test Suite: Introduced a new test suite file, pkg/csi/recover/recover_suite_test.go, to properly integrate Ginkgo for the recover package.
• Expanded Test Coverage for FuseRecover: Added comprehensive unit tests for various functionalities within the FuseRecover package, including initializeKubeletClient, NewFuseRecover, Start, runOnce, recover, recoverBrokenMount, umountDuplicate, eventRecord, shouldRecover, and doRecover.
• Feature Gate and Environment Variable Testing: Created a new test file, pkg/csi/recover/register_test.go, to specifically test the Enabled function's logic based on NODEPUBLISH_METHOD environment variable and the FuseRecovery feature gate.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[fluid-e2e-bot]

Hi @adity1raut. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a fluid-cloudnative member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 56.41%. Comparing base (7b2a096) to head (c43fdca).
⚠️ Report is 6 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #5423      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   57.46%   56.41%   -1.05%     
==========================================
  Files         443      443              
  Lines       30735    30735              
==========================================
- Hits        17661    17340     -321     
- Misses      11460    11845     +385     
+ Partials     1614     1550      -64     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request does a great job of refactoring the tests for the recover package to use Ginkgo and Gomega, which significantly improves their structure and readability. The test coverage has also been expanded to include more scenarios, which is a great enhancement. I've found a couple of areas in the new tests that could be improved for robustness and correctness. My comments are focused on making the tests more reliable.

[RongGu]

@adity1raut Please resolve the comments by gemini.

[adity1raut]

@adity1raut Please resolve the comments by gemini.

Yeah Sure

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
9 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
2 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
34.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[adity1raut]

/cc @cheyang @RongGu