refactor(tests): migrate to Ginkgo and Gomega for improved test structure #5430
Conversation
Signed-off-by: adity1raut <[email protected]>
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Summary of ChangesHello @adity1raut, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request establishes a foundational test suite for the Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
|
Hi @adity1raut. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a fluid-cloudnative member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request introduces an initial test suite for the updatedbconf package, migrating existing tests to use Ginkgo and Gomega. While the PR adds a good foundation for testing, several key tests for the Register function are currently skipped due to its design not being conducive to isolated testing. Additionally, the integration test is set up but lacks actual test logic. Addressing these points will significantly improve the test coverage and maintainability of the updatedbconf package.
| } | ||
|
|
||
| tempDir := GinkgoT().TempDir() | ||
| Expect(tempDir).ToNot(BeEmpty()) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The integration test is currently incomplete. While it correctly sets up a temporary directory, it doesn't contain any actual test logic to verify the integration of the updatedbconf package components. Please add specific assertions and steps to truly test the integration aspects of the Register function, such as writing to the temporary file and verifying its content after Register is called.
…ture Signed-off-by: adity1raut <[email protected]>
adity1raut
changed the title
|
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #5430 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 57.46% 56.13% -1.34%
==========================================
Files 443 443
Lines 30735 30735
==========================================
- Hits 17661 17252 -409
- Misses 11460 11918 +458
+ Partials 1614 1565 -49 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
1 participant
Ⅰ. Describe what this PR does
Ⅱ. Does this pull request fix one issue?
Part of #5407
Ⅲ. List the added test cases (unit test/integration test) if any, please explain if no tests are needed.
Ⅳ. Describe how to verify it
Ⅴ. Special notes for reviews