-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
Runtime conventions tests #5432
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Runtime conventions tests #5432
Conversation
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Summary of ChangesHello @hxrshxz, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request introduces new unit tests to enhance the robustness of runtime convention utilities. Specifically, it adds comprehensive table-driven tests for the Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
|
Hi @hxrshxz. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a fluid-cloudnative member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request introduces comprehensive unit tests for the GetWorkerStatefulsetName function in pkg/ddc/base/runtime_conventions.go. The tests are well-structured using a table-driven approach, covering various runtime types and ensuring the function behaves as expected. This significantly improves the test coverage and reliability of the RuntimeInfo methods.
| runtimeType: "", | ||
| want: "test-worker", | ||
| }, | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Consider adding a test case for an explicitly 'unknown' or 'unsupported' runtime type. While the empty runtime type currently falls into the default case, an explicit test with a distinct, non-empty unknown type would make the test suite more robust and clearly demonstrate the default behavior for any future, unhandled runtime types.
{
name: "unknown runtime type uses default suffix",
runtimeName: "unknown-data",
runtimeType: "UnknownRuntime",
want: "unknown-data-worker",
},There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Pull request overview
This PR adds unit tests for the GetWorkerStatefulsetName() method in pkg/ddc/base/runtime_conventions.go. The tests verify that JindoRuntime and its variants correctly append the "-jindofs" suffix while other runtimes use the default "-worker" suffix.
Changes:
- Added table-driven unit tests for
GetWorkerStatefulsetName()method covering Jindo runtime variants and default behavior
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
9ec0bb9 to
72e868e
Compare
Signed-off-by: Harsh <[email protected]>
72e868e to
4190da9
Compare
|



Ⅰ. Describe what this PR does
test(pkg/ddc/base): add unit tests for
validate.goⅡ. Does this pull request fix one issue?
part of #5407
Ⅲ. List the added test cases
TestValidateRuntimeInfo: Table-driven tests covering valid input, empty OwnerDatasetUID, unset placement mode, and combined invalid states.Ⅳ. Describe how to verify it
go test ./pkg/ddc/base/... -run TestValidateRuntimeInfo -v