Open
Conversation
kmatasfp
commented
Mar 17, 2026
| tag_suite!(revert, group3); | ||
|
|
||
| tag_suite!(rdbms_service, rdbms_service); | ||
| tag_suite!(resource_limits, group1); |
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
not sure what is the criteria how the tests are grouped, so if this is not the correct group let me know
vigoo
approved these changes
Mar 17, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Resolves: #2971
Function table limits Implementation based on existing memory limits implementation.
For determining the initially configured limit of 16384 I used
wasm-toolto analyze test-comonents and Peters app and then 10x the biggest value I saw and chose closest number to it that is power of 2,