Skip to content

Conversation

@joshlf
Copy link
Member

@joshlf joshlf commented Feb 2, 2026

Addresses #2966 (comment)

@joshlf joshlf requested a review from jswrenn February 2, 2026 14:54
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @joshlf, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request updates the code review guidelines to provide specific instructions on how to interpret and review TODO comments that are used as temporary placeholders for safety-related justifications and documentation. The aim is to streamline the review process by preventing premature flagging of these specific TODO types, ensuring reviewers understand their intended temporary nature.

Highlights

  • Updated Review Guidelines for TODOs: A new guideline has been added to clarify how reviewers should handle TODO comments that serve as placeholders for safety justifications (// SAFETY: TODO) and safety documentation (/// TODO within /// # Safety sections). These are now explicitly recognized as valid temporary placeholders and should not be flagged as critical issues or missing documentation.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request updates the agent review guidelines to clarify how TODO comments should be handled in safety-related contexts. The added instruction is clear and serves its purpose well. I have one suggestion to improve the formatting of the new text for better readability by using Markdown's code formatting for code snippets.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 92.02%. Comparing base (36e8abe) to head (049061a).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2967   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   92.02%   92.02%           
=======================================
  Files          19       19           
  Lines        6029     6029           
=======================================
  Hits         5548     5548           
  Misses        481      481           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@joshlf joshlf added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 2, 2026
Merged via the queue into main with commit 42ff03b Feb 2, 2026
104 checks passed
@joshlf joshlf deleted the joshlf-patch-6 branch February 2, 2026 16:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants