Skip to content

Conversation

@achingbrain
Copy link
Member

@achingbrain achingbrain commented Nov 8, 2025

If an IPNS name in a TXT record is not parsable as a PeerId, it's probably another DNSLink, so try to resolve it as such.

Change checklist

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation if necessary (this includes comments as well)
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works

If an IPNS name in a TXT record is not parsable as a PeerId, it's
probably another DNSLink, so try to resolve it as such.
@achingbrain achingbrain requested a review from a team as a code owner November 8, 2025 15:59
@achingbrain achingbrain merged commit 636e950 into main Nov 10, 2025
19 checks passed
@achingbrain achingbrain deleted the fix/support-recursive-dnslink branch November 10, 2025 05:55
@achingbrain achingbrain mentioned this pull request Nov 10, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants