-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14
Implemented access control for admins and users #2119
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Implemented access control for admins and users #2119
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@anisjellazi has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 12 minutes and 42 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (4)
WalkthroughThe pull request involves a comprehensive refactoring of the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant AuthController
participant Logger
Client->>AuthController: POST /login
AuthController->>Logger: Log login attempt
AuthController-->>Client: Return login result
Client->>AuthController: POST /logout
AuthController->>Logger: Log logout attempt
AuthController-->>Client: Return logout result
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🔭 Outside diff range comments (2)
Streetcode/Streetcode.WebApi/Controllers/Authentication/AuthController.cs (2)
45-68: Add CSRF protection to the Logout endpoint.The logout endpoint should be protected against CSRF attacks since it's a state-changing operation.
Example implementation:
[Authorize] [HttpPost] +[ValidateAntiForgeryToken] [ProducesResponseType(StatusCodes.Status200OK)] public async Task<IActionResult> Logout()
71-103: Enhance security of the Google login implementation.Several security improvements are needed:
- Validate the Google ID token before processing
- Add error handling for invalid roles
- Implement role mapping instead of direct assignment
Example implementation:
public async Task<IActionResult> GoogleLogin([FromBody] string idToken) { + if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(idToken)) + { + return BadRequest("ID token is required"); + } + + // Validate the Google ID token + var validationSettings = new GoogleTokenValidationSettings + { + ValidIssuer = "accounts.google.com", + ValidAudience = _configuration["Google:ClientId"] + }; + + try + { + await GoogleTokenValidator.ValidateAsync(idToken, validationSettings); + } + catch (Exception ex) + { + return Unauthorized("Invalid Google token"); + } + var result = await Mediator.Send(new LoginGoogleQuery(idToken)); if (result.IsSuccess) { var user = result.Value; - var roles = user.Roles; + var roles = await _roleManager.MapExternalRolesToApplicationRoles(user.Roles); + + if (!roles.Any()) + { + roles = new[] { "User" }; // Default role + } var claims = new List<Claim> { new Claim(ClaimTypes.NameIdentifier, user.UserId), new Claim(ClaimTypes.Name, user.Username) }; foreach (var role in roles) { + if (await _roleManager.RoleExistsAsync(role)) + { claims.Add(new Claim(ClaimTypes.Role, role)); + } }
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
Streetcode/Streetcode.WebApi/Controllers/Authentication/AuthController.cs (2)
106-111: Enhance the AdminDashboard implementation.The current implementation is a placeholder. Consider:
- Returning actual dashboard data
- Adding logging for admin access
- Adding caching for performance
Example implementation:
[Authorize(Roles = "Admin")] [HttpGet("admin-dashboard")] +[ResponseCache(Duration = 60)] // Cache for 1 minute public IActionResult AdminDashboard() { - return Ok("Admin Dashboard"); + _logger.LogInformation("Admin dashboard accessed by: {User}", User.Identity.Name); + var dashboardData = await _dashboardService.GetAdminDashboardDataAsync(); + return Ok(dashboardData); }
114-127: Revise the GetProfile endpoint design.The current implementation has several issues:
- Returning 404 for admins is confusing - they should have their own profile
- Returns placeholder data instead of actual profile
- Missing proper error handling
Consider this alternative design:
[Authorize] [HttpGet("profile")] public IActionResult GetProfile() { var currentUser = User.Identity.Name; + if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(currentUser)) + { + return BadRequest("User not found"); + } - if (User.IsInRole("Admin")) - { - return NotFound(); // Redirect admin to 404 or similar - } + try + { + var profile = await _userService.GetUserProfileAsync(currentUser); + if (profile == null) + { + return NotFound($"Profile not found for user: {currentUser}"); + } + return Ok(profile); + } + catch (Exception ex) + { + _logger.LogError(ex, "Error retrieving profile for user: {User}", currentUser); + return StatusCode(500, "An error occurred while retrieving the profile"); + } - return Ok("User profile data"); }
Streetcode/Streetcode.WebApi/Controllers/Authentication/AuthController.cs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Streetcode/Streetcode.WebApi/Controllers/Authentication/AuthController.cs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Streetcode/Streetcode.WebApi/Controllers/Authentication/AuthController.cs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Streetcode/Streetcode.WebApi/Controllers/Authentication/AuthController.cs(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
Streetcode/Streetcode.WebApi/Controllers/Authentication/AuthController.cs (2)
1-44: Maintain security measures from previous implementation.Based on past review comments, ensure these security measures are implemented:
- CSRF protection for all state-changing operations
- Rate limiting for public endpoints (especially token refresh and registration)
- Input validation for all DTOs
- Consistent error handling and logging strategy
Let's verify the security configuration:
#!/bin/bash # Check for security attributes and rate limiting configuration echo "Checking security attributes..." rg -A 5 "\[(ValidateAntiForgeryToken|EnableRateLimiting|Authorize)\]" echo "Checking rate limiting configuration..." rg -A 10 "AddRateLimiter" Program.cs
31-44:⚠️ Potential issueFix code duplication and implement actual authentication logic.
The file contains:
- Duplicate class declarations
- No implementation of authentication methods
- Missing access control logic for admins and users as mentioned in PR objectives
Here's a suggested structure for the controller:
[ApiController] [Route("api/[controller]")] [ValidateAntiForgeryToken] [EnableRateLimiting("api")] public class AuthController : BaseApiController { private readonly ILogger<AuthController> _logger; public AuthController(ILogger<AuthController> logger) { _logger = logger; } + [HttpPost("login")] + [EnableRateLimiting("auth")] + [ProducesResponseType(StatusCodes.Status200OK)] + [ProducesResponseType(StatusCodes.Status401Unauthorized)] + public async Task<IActionResult> Login([FromBody] LoginRequestDTO request) + { + try + { + _logger.LogInformation("Login attempt for user: {Username}", request.Username); + var result = await Mediator.Send(new LoginQuery(request)); + return HandleResult(result); + } + catch (Exception ex) + { + _logger.LogError(ex, "Error during login for user: {Username}", request.Username); + return StatusCode(500, "An error occurred during login"); + } + } + // TODO: Implement Register, RefreshToken, and Logout endpoints with proper role-based access control + // Example: + // [Authorize(Roles = "Admin")] + // [HttpPost("register/admin")] + // public async Task<IActionResult> RegisterAdmin([FromBody] RegisterRequestDTO request) }Let's verify the role-based access control requirements:
| 🛠️ Refactor suggestion | ||
|
|
||
| namespace Streetcode.WebApi.Controllers.Authentication | ||
| { | ||
| [ApiController] | ||
| public class AuthController : BaseApiController | ||
| { | ||
| [HttpPost] | ||
| [ProducesResponseType(StatusCodes.Status200OK, Type = typeof(LoginResponseDTO))] | ||
| public async Task<IActionResult> Login([FromBody] LoginRequestDTO loginDTO) | ||
| { | ||
| return HandleResult(await Mediator.Send(new LoginQuery(loginDTO))); | ||
| } | ||
| Implement consistent security measures across the controller. | ||
|
|
||
| [HttpPost] | ||
| [ProducesResponseType(StatusCodes.Status200OK, Type = typeof(RegisterResponseDTO))] | ||
| public async Task<IActionResult> Register([FromBody] RegisterRequestDTO registerDTO) | ||
| { | ||
| return HandleResult(await Mediator.Send(new RegisterQuery(registerDTO))); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| [HttpPost] | ||
| [ProducesResponseType(StatusCodes.Status200OK, Type = typeof(RefreshTokenResponceDTO))] | ||
| public async Task<IActionResult> RefreshToken([FromBody] RefreshTokenRequestDTO token) | ||
| { | ||
| return HandleResult(await Mediator.Send(new RefreshTokenQuery(token))); | ||
| } | ||
| Consider applying these security measures controller-wide: | ||
|
|
||
| [Authorize] | ||
| [HttpPost] | ||
| [ProducesResponseType(StatusCodes.Status200OK)] | ||
| public async Task<IActionResult> Logout() | ||
| { | ||
| var userId = User.Claims.FirstOrDefault(c => c.Type == ClaimTypes.NameIdentifier)?.Value; | ||
| CSRF protection for all state-changing operations | ||
| Rate limiting for all public endpoints | ||
| Consistent error handling and logging strategy | ||
|
|
||
| if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(userId)) | ||
| { | ||
| return Unauthorized("User is not authenticated."); | ||
| } | ||
| Example implementation: | ||
|
|
||
| var result = await Mediator.Send(new LogoutCommand(userId)); | ||
| [ApiController] | ||
| +[ValidateAntiForgeryToken] // Apply to all POST endpoints | ||
| +[EnableRateLimiting("api")] // Configure different limits per endpoint in Program.cs | ||
| public class AuthController : BaseApiController | ||
| { | ||
| + private readonly ILogger<AuthController> _logger; | ||
| + | ||
| + public AuthController(ILogger<AuthController> logger) | ||
| + { | ||
| + _logger = logger; | ||
| + } | ||
|
|
||
| if (result.IsFailed) | ||
| { | ||
| return BadRequest(result.Errors.First().Message); | ||
| } | ||
| 📝 Committable suggestion | ||
|
|
||
| return Ok("Logout successful. Refresh token invalidated."); | ||
| } | ||
| ‼️ IMPORTANT | ||
| Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements. | ||
|
|
||
| [HttpPost] | ||
| [ProducesResponseType(StatusCodes.Status200OK, Type = typeof(LoginResponseDTO))] | ||
| public async Task<IActionResult> GoogleLogin([FromBody] string idToken) | ||
| Suggested change | ||
| [ApiController] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Remove suggestion template formatting.
The file appears to be a suggestion template with emojis and markdown-like formatting. This should be replaced with actual code implementation.
Remove all template formatting (emojis, markdown headers, etc.) and implement the actual controller code.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
♻️ Duplicate comments (2)
Streetcode/Streetcode.WebApi/Controllers/Authentication/AuthController.cs (2)
37-43: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionEnhance security for Register endpoint.
The registration endpoint needs additional security measures.
[HttpPost("register")] +[EnableRateLimiting("registration")] // Stricter rate limit for registration +[ValidateAntiForgeryToken] [ProducesResponseType(StatusCodes.Status200OK, Type = typeof(RegisterResponseDTO))] public async Task<IActionResult> Register([FromBody] RegisterRequestDTO registerDTO) { - _logger.LogInformation("New user registration attempt: {Email}", registerDTO.Email); + _logger.LogInformation("New user registration attempt received"); // Don't log PII + if (!ModelState.IsValid) + { + return BadRequest(ModelState); + } return HandleResult(await Mediator.Send(new RegisterQuery(registerDTO))); }
45-51: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionAdd specific rate limiting to RefreshToken endpoint.
Token refresh endpoints need stricter rate limiting to prevent abuse.
[HttpPost("refresh-token")] +[EnableRateLimiting("token-refresh")] // Stricter rate limit for token refresh +[ValidateAntiForgeryToken] [ProducesResponseType(StatusCodes.Status200OK, Type = typeof(RefreshTokenResponceDTO))] public async Task<IActionResult> RefreshToken([FromBody] RefreshTokenRequestDTO token) { _logger.LogInformation("Refresh token attempt."); + if (!ModelState.IsValid) + { + return BadRequest(ModelState); + } return HandleResult(await Mediator.Send(new RefreshTokenQuery(token))); }
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
Streetcode/Streetcode.WebApi/Controllers/Authentication/AuthController.cs (1)
1-94: Consider implementing role-based access control (RBAC).Given the PR objective of implementing access control for admins and users, consider adding role-based authorization attributes to appropriate endpoints.
Example implementation:
+public static class Roles +{ + public const string Admin = "Admin"; + public const string User = "User"; +} [ApiController] [EnableRateLimiting("api")] +[Authorize] // Require authentication by default [Route("api/[controller]")] public class AuthController : BaseApiController { // ... existing code ... + [AllowAnonymous] // Explicitly allow anonymous access [HttpPost("login")] // ... login method ... + [AllowAnonymous] [HttpPost("register")] // ... register method ... + [AllowAnonymous] [HttpPost("refresh-token")] // ... refresh token method ... + [Authorize(Roles = Roles.Admin)] // Add admin-only endpoints + [HttpGet("users")] + public async Task<IActionResult> GetUsers() + { + // Implementation + } }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Streetcode/Streetcode.WebApi/Controllers/Authentication/AuthController.cs(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
Streetcode/Streetcode.WebApi/Controllers/Authentication/AuthController.cs (2)
4-5: LGTM! Good security practice with rate limiting.The addition of controller-level rate limiting and proper route configuration enhances API security.
Also applies to: 18-19
22-27: LGTM! Well-implemented logging setup.The logger is properly initialized using dependency injection and follows best practices with the readonly modifier.
Streetcode/Streetcode.WebApi/Controllers/Authentication/AuthController.cs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Streetcode/Streetcode.WebApi/Controllers/Authentication/AuthController.cs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
Hello @anisjellazi , I noticed you have submitted a pull request to our repository, and I appreciate your contribution. Before proceeding, I would like to learn a bit more about you and the purpose of this request. Could you kindly provide some details about: A brief introduction about yourself and your background. Best regards, |
dev
JIRA
Code reviewers
Second Level Review
Summary of issue
ToDo
Summary of change
ToDo
Testing approach
ToDo
CHECK LIST
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Refactor