Skip to content

Conversation

@anisjellazi
Copy link

@anisjellazi anisjellazi commented Feb 4, 2025

dev

JIRA

Code reviewers

  • @github_username

Second Level Review

  • @github_username

Summary of issue

ToDo

Summary of change

ToDo

Testing approach

ToDo

CHECK LIST

  • СI passed
  • Сode coverage >=95%
  • PR is reviewed manually again (to make sure you have 100% ready code)
  • All reviewers agreed to merge the PR
  • I've checked new feature as logged in and logged out user if needed
  • PR meets all conventions

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced rate limiting for all authentication endpoints to control API access.
    • Enhanced logging for significant user interactions, including login, registration, and logout attempts.
  • Refactor

    • Updated the structure of the AuthController to improve security and logging practices, including specific route attributes for clarity.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 4, 2025

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@anisjellazi has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 12 minutes and 42 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d33a844 and 48ead3e.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • Streetcode/Streetcode.WebApi/Controllers/AdminController.cs (1 hunks)
  • Streetcode/Streetcode.WebApi/Controllers/Authentication/AuthController.cs (2 hunks)
  • Streetcode/Streetcode.WebApi/Controllers/ProfileController.cs (1 hunks)
  • Streetcode/Streetcode.WebApi/Program.cs (6 hunks)

Walkthrough

The pull request involves a comprehensive refactoring of the AuthController class in the Streetcode.WebApi project. Key changes include the addition of rate limiting for API endpoints, the introduction of a private logger for improved logging practices, and the updating of existing POST endpoint routes for clarity. Enhanced error handling and logging for the logout process have also been implemented, reflecting a focus on security and traceability of user interactions.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
…/AuthController.cs Refactored AuthController class to include [EnableRateLimiting("api")], added a private logger ILogger<AuthController>, and updated routes for Login, Register, RefreshToken, Logout, and GoogleLogin methods. Enhanced logging for significant events and improved error handling in the Logout method.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Client
    participant AuthController
    participant Logger

    Client->>AuthController: POST /login
    AuthController->>Logger: Log login attempt
    AuthController-->>Client: Return login result

    Client->>AuthController: POST /logout
    AuthController->>Logger: Log logout attempt
    AuthController-->>Client: Return logout result
Loading

Poem

In the code where bunnies play,
Security hops in a brand new way.
With tokens and limits, we keep safe and sound,
Logging our steps as we leap all around.
So here’s to the changes, both swift and bright,
A bunny’s delight in the coding night!
🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

🔭 Outside diff range comments (2)
Streetcode/Streetcode.WebApi/Controllers/Authentication/AuthController.cs (2)

45-68: Add CSRF protection to the Logout endpoint.

The logout endpoint should be protected against CSRF attacks since it's a state-changing operation.

Example implementation:

 [Authorize]
 [HttpPost]
+[ValidateAntiForgeryToken]
 [ProducesResponseType(StatusCodes.Status200OK)]
 public async Task<IActionResult> Logout()

71-103: Enhance security of the Google login implementation.

Several security improvements are needed:

  1. Validate the Google ID token before processing
  2. Add error handling for invalid roles
  3. Implement role mapping instead of direct assignment

Example implementation:

 public async Task<IActionResult> GoogleLogin([FromBody] string idToken)
 {
+    if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(idToken))
+    {
+        return BadRequest("ID token is required");
+    }
+
+    // Validate the Google ID token
+    var validationSettings = new GoogleTokenValidationSettings
+    {
+        ValidIssuer = "accounts.google.com",
+        ValidAudience = _configuration["Google:ClientId"]
+    };
+
+    try 
+    {
+        await GoogleTokenValidator.ValidateAsync(idToken, validationSettings);
+    }
+    catch (Exception ex)
+    {
+        return Unauthorized("Invalid Google token");
+    }
+
     var result = await Mediator.Send(new LoginGoogleQuery(idToken));

     if (result.IsSuccess)
     {
         var user = result.Value;
-        var roles = user.Roles;
+        var roles = await _roleManager.MapExternalRolesToApplicationRoles(user.Roles);
+        
+        if (!roles.Any())
+        {
+            roles = new[] { "User" }; // Default role
+        }

         var claims = new List<Claim>
         {
             new Claim(ClaimTypes.NameIdentifier, user.UserId),
             new Claim(ClaimTypes.Name, user.Username)
         };

         foreach (var role in roles)
         {
+            if (await _roleManager.RoleExistsAsync(role))
+            {
                 claims.Add(new Claim(ClaimTypes.Role, role));
+            }
         }
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
Streetcode/Streetcode.WebApi/Controllers/Authentication/AuthController.cs (2)

106-111: Enhance the AdminDashboard implementation.

The current implementation is a placeholder. Consider:

  1. Returning actual dashboard data
  2. Adding logging for admin access
  3. Adding caching for performance

Example implementation:

 [Authorize(Roles = "Admin")]
 [HttpGet("admin-dashboard")]
+[ResponseCache(Duration = 60)] // Cache for 1 minute
 public IActionResult AdminDashboard()
 {
-    return Ok("Admin Dashboard");
+    _logger.LogInformation("Admin dashboard accessed by: {User}", User.Identity.Name);
+    var dashboardData = await _dashboardService.GetAdminDashboardDataAsync();
+    return Ok(dashboardData);
 }

114-127: Revise the GetProfile endpoint design.

The current implementation has several issues:

  1. Returning 404 for admins is confusing - they should have their own profile
  2. Returns placeholder data instead of actual profile
  3. Missing proper error handling

Consider this alternative design:

 [Authorize]
 [HttpGet("profile")]
 public IActionResult GetProfile()
 {
     var currentUser = User.Identity.Name;
+    if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(currentUser))
+    {
+        return BadRequest("User not found");
+    }

-    if (User.IsInRole("Admin"))
-    {
-        return NotFound(); // Redirect admin to 404 or similar
-    }
+    try
+    {
+        var profile = await _userService.GetUserProfileAsync(currentUser);
+        if (profile == null)
+        {
+            return NotFound($"Profile not found for user: {currentUser}");
+        }
+        return Ok(profile);
+    }
+    catch (Exception ex)
+    {
+        _logger.LogError(ex, "Error retrieving profile for user: {User}", currentUser);
+        return StatusCode(500, "An error occurred while retrieving the profile");
+    }
-    return Ok("User profile data");
 }
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7a070f6 and ac39e30.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • Streetcode/Streetcode.WebApi/Controllers/Authentication/AuthController.cs (4 hunks)

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ac39e30 and d842181.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • Streetcode/Streetcode.WebApi/Controllers/Authentication/AuthController.cs (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
Streetcode/Streetcode.WebApi/Controllers/Authentication/AuthController.cs (2)

1-44: Maintain security measures from previous implementation.

Based on past review comments, ensure these security measures are implemented:

  1. CSRF protection for all state-changing operations
  2. Rate limiting for public endpoints (especially token refresh and registration)
  3. Input validation for all DTOs
  4. Consistent error handling and logging strategy

Let's verify the security configuration:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for security attributes and rate limiting configuration
echo "Checking security attributes..."
rg -A 5 "\[(ValidateAntiForgeryToken|EnableRateLimiting|Authorize)\]" 

echo "Checking rate limiting configuration..."
rg -A 10 "AddRateLimiter" Program.cs

31-44: ⚠️ Potential issue

Fix code duplication and implement actual authentication logic.

The file contains:

  1. Duplicate class declarations
  2. No implementation of authentication methods
  3. Missing access control logic for admins and users as mentioned in PR objectives

Here's a suggested structure for the controller:

 [ApiController]
 [Route("api/[controller]")]
 [ValidateAntiForgeryToken]
 [EnableRateLimiting("api")]
 public class AuthController : BaseApiController
 {
     private readonly ILogger<AuthController> _logger;
     
     public AuthController(ILogger<AuthController> logger)
     {
         _logger = logger;
     }

+    [HttpPost("login")]
+    [EnableRateLimiting("auth")]
+    [ProducesResponseType(StatusCodes.Status200OK)]
+    [ProducesResponseType(StatusCodes.Status401Unauthorized)]
+    public async Task<IActionResult> Login([FromBody] LoginRequestDTO request)
+    {
+        try
+        {
+            _logger.LogInformation("Login attempt for user: {Username}", request.Username);
+            var result = await Mediator.Send(new LoginQuery(request));
+            return HandleResult(result);
+        }
+        catch (Exception ex)
+        {
+            _logger.LogError(ex, "Error during login for user: {Username}", request.Username);
+            return StatusCode(500, "An error occurred during login");
+        }
+    }

+    // TODO: Implement Register, RefreshToken, and Logout endpoints with proper role-based access control
+    // Example:
+    // [Authorize(Roles = "Admin")]
+    // [HttpPost("register/admin")]
+    // public async Task<IActionResult> RegisterAdmin([FromBody] RegisterRequestDTO request)
 }

Let's verify the role-based access control requirements:

Comment on lines 1 to 31
🛠️ Refactor suggestion

namespace Streetcode.WebApi.Controllers.Authentication
{
[ApiController]
public class AuthController : BaseApiController
{
[HttpPost]
[ProducesResponseType(StatusCodes.Status200OK, Type = typeof(LoginResponseDTO))]
public async Task<IActionResult> Login([FromBody] LoginRequestDTO loginDTO)
{
return HandleResult(await Mediator.Send(new LoginQuery(loginDTO)));
}
Implement consistent security measures across the controller.

[HttpPost]
[ProducesResponseType(StatusCodes.Status200OK, Type = typeof(RegisterResponseDTO))]
public async Task<IActionResult> Register([FromBody] RegisterRequestDTO registerDTO)
{
return HandleResult(await Mediator.Send(new RegisterQuery(registerDTO)));
}

[HttpPost]
[ProducesResponseType(StatusCodes.Status200OK, Type = typeof(RefreshTokenResponceDTO))]
public async Task<IActionResult> RefreshToken([FromBody] RefreshTokenRequestDTO token)
{
return HandleResult(await Mediator.Send(new RefreshTokenQuery(token)));
}
Consider applying these security measures controller-wide:

[Authorize]
[HttpPost]
[ProducesResponseType(StatusCodes.Status200OK)]
public async Task<IActionResult> Logout()
{
var userId = User.Claims.FirstOrDefault(c => c.Type == ClaimTypes.NameIdentifier)?.Value;
CSRF protection for all state-changing operations
Rate limiting for all public endpoints
Consistent error handling and logging strategy

if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(userId))
{
return Unauthorized("User is not authenticated.");
}
Example implementation:

var result = await Mediator.Send(new LogoutCommand(userId));
[ApiController]
+[ValidateAntiForgeryToken] // Apply to all POST endpoints
+[EnableRateLimiting("api")] // Configure different limits per endpoint in Program.cs
public class AuthController : BaseApiController
{
+ private readonly ILogger<AuthController> _logger;
+
+ public AuthController(ILogger<AuthController> logger)
+ {
+ _logger = logger;
+ }

if (result.IsFailed)
{
return BadRequest(result.Errors.First().Message);
}
📝 Committable suggestion

return Ok("Logout successful. Refresh token invalidated.");
}
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

[HttpPost]
[ProducesResponseType(StatusCodes.Status200OK, Type = typeof(LoginResponseDTO))]
public async Task<IActionResult> GoogleLogin([FromBody] string idToken)
Suggested change
[ApiController]
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Remove suggestion template formatting.

The file appears to be a suggestion template with emojis and markdown-like formatting. This should be replaced with actual code implementation.

Remove all template formatting (emojis, markdown headers, etc.) and implement the actual controller code.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

♻️ Duplicate comments (2)
Streetcode/Streetcode.WebApi/Controllers/Authentication/AuthController.cs (2)

37-43: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Enhance security for Register endpoint.

The registration endpoint needs additional security measures.

 [HttpPost("register")]
+[EnableRateLimiting("registration")] // Stricter rate limit for registration
+[ValidateAntiForgeryToken]
 [ProducesResponseType(StatusCodes.Status200OK, Type = typeof(RegisterResponseDTO))]
 public async Task<IActionResult> Register([FromBody] RegisterRequestDTO registerDTO)
 {
-    _logger.LogInformation("New user registration attempt: {Email}", registerDTO.Email);
+    _logger.LogInformation("New user registration attempt received"); // Don't log PII
+    if (!ModelState.IsValid)
+    {
+        return BadRequest(ModelState);
+    }
     return HandleResult(await Mediator.Send(new RegisterQuery(registerDTO)));
 }

45-51: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Add specific rate limiting to RefreshToken endpoint.

Token refresh endpoints need stricter rate limiting to prevent abuse.

 [HttpPost("refresh-token")]
+[EnableRateLimiting("token-refresh")] // Stricter rate limit for token refresh
+[ValidateAntiForgeryToken]
 [ProducesResponseType(StatusCodes.Status200OK, Type = typeof(RefreshTokenResponceDTO))]
 public async Task<IActionResult> RefreshToken([FromBody] RefreshTokenRequestDTO token)
 {
     _logger.LogInformation("Refresh token attempt.");
+    if (!ModelState.IsValid)
+    {
+        return BadRequest(ModelState);
+    }
     return HandleResult(await Mediator.Send(new RefreshTokenQuery(token)));
 }
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
Streetcode/Streetcode.WebApi/Controllers/Authentication/AuthController.cs (1)

1-94: Consider implementing role-based access control (RBAC).

Given the PR objective of implementing access control for admins and users, consider adding role-based authorization attributes to appropriate endpoints.

Example implementation:

+public static class Roles
+{
+    public const string Admin = "Admin";
+    public const string User = "User";
+}

 [ApiController]
 [EnableRateLimiting("api")]
+[Authorize] // Require authentication by default
 [Route("api/[controller]")]
 public class AuthController : BaseApiController
 {
     // ... existing code ...

+    [AllowAnonymous] // Explicitly allow anonymous access
     [HttpPost("login")]
     // ... login method ...

+    [AllowAnonymous]
     [HttpPost("register")]
     // ... register method ...

+    [AllowAnonymous]
     [HttpPost("refresh-token")]
     // ... refresh token method ...

+    [Authorize(Roles = Roles.Admin)] // Add admin-only endpoints
+    [HttpGet("users")]
+    public async Task<IActionResult> GetUsers()
+    {
+        // Implementation
+    }
 }
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d842181 and d33a844.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • Streetcode/Streetcode.WebApi/Controllers/Authentication/AuthController.cs (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
Streetcode/Streetcode.WebApi/Controllers/Authentication/AuthController.cs (2)

4-5: LGTM! Good security practice with rate limiting.

The addition of controller-level rate limiting and proper route configuration enhances API security.

Also applies to: 18-19


22-27: LGTM! Well-implemented logging setup.

The logger is properly initialized using dependency injection and follows best practices with the readonly modifier.

@IrynaZavushchak
Copy link
Contributor

Hello @anisjellazi ,

I noticed you have submitted a pull request to our repository, and I appreciate your contribution. Before proceeding, I would like to learn a bit more about you and the purpose of this request.

Could you kindly provide some details about:

A brief introduction about yourself and your background.
A short description of the changes introduced in the pull request.
The goal or motivation behind these changes.
Looking forward to your response. Thank you for your time and contribution!

Best regards,
Iryna

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants