Bump CAPI to v1.12.2

[mboersma]

What type of PR is this?

/kind cleanup

What this PR does / why we need it:

Updates the Cluster API dependency to v1.12.2.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #5965

Special notes for your reviewer:

See https://cluster-api.sigs.k8s.io/developer/providers/migrations/v1.11-to-v1.12 for migration details.

TODOs:

• squashed commits
• includes documentation
• adds unit tests
• cherry-pick candidate

Release note:

Bump CAPI to v1.12.2

[k8s-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign fabriziopandini for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[mboersma]

/hold

CAPZ should do a minor release with v1.11.x before this merges.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 50.00000% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 44.41%. Comparing base (012443d) to head (7d6cf45).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...ntrollers/azureasomanagedmachinepool_controller.go	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️
controllers/helpers.go	50.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #6009   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   44.41%   44.41%           
=======================================
  Files         280      280           
  Lines       25379    25379           
=======================================
  Hits        11273    11273           
  Misses      13293    13293           
  Partials      813      813           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[mboersma]

The CustomResourceDefinition "kubeadmcontrolplanes.controlplane.cluster.x-k8s.io" is invalid: metadata.annotations: Too long: may not be more than 262144 bytes

Interesting.

[nojnhuh]

The CustomResourceDefinition "kubeadmcontrolplanes.controlplane.cluster.x-k8s.io" is invalid: metadata.annotations: Too long: may not be more than 262144 bytes

Interesting.

Where exactly is that error coming from? Server-side apply is how I've worked around this before. That would be easy to add for a literal kubectl apply, not sure how we'd tell clusterctl to do that though.

[mboersma]

/retest

[k8s-ci-robot]

@mboersma: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name	Commit	Details	Required	Rerun command
pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-capi-e2e	7d6cf45	link	false	/test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-capi-e2e
pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-e2e-workload-upgrade	7d6cf45	link	true	/test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-e2e-workload-upgrade
pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-apiversion-upgrade	7d6cf45	link	true	/test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-apiversion-upgrade

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

[mboersma]

/close

See #6127

[k8s-ci-robot]

@mboersma: Closed this PR.

Details

In response to this:

/close

See #6127

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.