Skip to content

Conversation

@chrischdi
Copy link
Member

@chrischdi chrischdi commented Nov 7, 2025

What this PR does / why we need it:

Implements e2e tests for taint propagation feature: #12908

TODO:

Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):
Fixes #

/area e2e-testing

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. area/e2e-testing Issues or PRs related to e2e testing cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. labels Nov 7, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. label Nov 7, 2025
@chrischdi
Copy link
Member Author

/test help

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@chrischdi: The specified target(s) for /test were not found.
The following commands are available to trigger required jobs:

/test pull-cluster-api-build-main
/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-blocking-main
/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-conformance-ci-latest-main
/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-conformance-main
/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-latestk8s-main
/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-main
/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-main-gke
/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-mink8s-main
/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-upgrade-1-34-1-35-main
/test pull-cluster-api-test-main
/test pull-cluster-api-test-mink8s-main
/test pull-cluster-api-verify-main

The following commands are available to trigger optional jobs:

/test pull-cluster-api-apidiff-main

Use /test all to run the following jobs that were automatically triggered:

pull-cluster-api-apidiff-main
pull-cluster-api-build-main
pull-cluster-api-e2e-blocking-main
pull-cluster-api-test-main
pull-cluster-api-verify-main

In response to this:

/test help

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@chrischdi
Copy link
Member Author

/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-main-gke

@chrischdi
Copy link
Member Author

Unrelated flake?

/retest

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Nov 10, 2025
@chrischdi chrischdi force-pushed the pr-implement-taint-propagation-e2e branch from 8943c0c to 62d0372 Compare November 11, 2025 14:01
@chrischdi
Copy link
Member Author

/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-main-gke

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Nov 11, 2025
@chrischdi chrischdi force-pushed the pr-implement-taint-propagation-e2e branch from 62d0372 to 0509f99 Compare November 12, 2025 13:39
@chrischdi
Copy link
Member Author

/label tide/merge-method-squash

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the tide/merge-method-squash Denotes a PR that should be squashed by tide when it merges. label Nov 12, 2025
@chrischdi chrischdi force-pushed the pr-implement-taint-propagation-e2e branch from 0509f99 to cfad6fc Compare November 12, 2025 17:18
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. labels Nov 12, 2025
@chrischdi
Copy link
Member Author

/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-main-gke

/retitle 🌱 taint propagation: e2e coverage via md rollout test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot changed the title [WIP] 🌱 taint propagation: e2e coverage via md rollout test 🌱 taint propagation: e2e coverage via md rollout test Nov 12, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Nov 12, 2025
@sbueringer
Copy link
Member

Thank you very much!

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 13, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: 3fee97604d0c865aad43958fc591f39bcb773819

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: sbueringer

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Nov 13, 2025
@sbueringer
Copy link
Member

/hold

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Nov 13, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 13, 2025
@chrischdi
Copy link
Member Author

/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-main-gke

@sbueringer
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 13, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: c5237cc4c44abee951ed5dcf7cd1057e168ce365

Copy link
Member

@fabriziopandini fabriziopandini left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

great work!

NodeTaints: wantNodeTaints,
})

Byf("Verify in-place propagation when removing an Always taint from the nodes")
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should this be

Suggested change
Byf("Verify in-place propagation when removing an Always taint from the nodes")
Byf("Verify in-place propagation when removing preExisting Always and OnInitialization taint from the nodes")

. "github.com/onsi/ginkgo/v2"
)

var _ = Describe("When testing MachineDeployment rolling upgrades", func() {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

may be

Suggested change
var _ = Describe("When testing MachineDeployment rolling upgrades and in-place taint propagation", func() {

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 14, 2025
@chrischdi
Copy link
Member Author

/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-main-gke

@sbueringer
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 14, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: 777943ecf8a79b8089b9574a2aa9f509f3dd7c48

@chrischdi
Copy link
Member Author

/hold cancel

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Nov 14, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit f9028d7 into kubernetes-sigs:main Nov 14, 2025
19 checks passed
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.12 milestone Nov 14, 2025
alicefr pushed a commit to alicefr/cluster-api that referenced this pull request Nov 14, 2025
…s#12966)

* taints: add e2e via md-rollout test

* taints: Refer the proposal from the book

* e2e: also check no rollout happened

* Review fixes and fix no-rollout check
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/e2e-testing Issues or PRs related to e2e testing cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. tide/merge-method-squash Denotes a PR that should be squashed by tide when it merges.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants