Skip to content

Conversation

@afbjorklund
Copy link
Collaborator

@afbjorklund afbjorklund commented Nov 8, 2025

The list of enabled and disabled checks is not well maintained, so it stops all version upgrades.

$ make lint GOLINT_VERSION=v2.3.1
...
94 issues:
* revive: 94
$ make lint GOLINT_VERSION=v2.6.1
...
99 issues:
* revive: 99

The "gofmt" and "goimports" formatters were not enabled in golint, only as separate make targets.

$ make gofmt
cmd/minikube/cmd/config/view.go
pkg/minikube/assets/addons_test.go
pkg/minikube/assets/vm_assets.go
pkg/minikube/download/licenses.go
test/integration/iso_test.go
make: *** [Makefile:488: gofmt] Error 1
$ make goimports
cmd/minikube/cmd/config/view.go
pkg/minikube/assets/addons_test.go
pkg/minikube/assets/vm_assets.go
pkg/minikube/download/licenses.go
pkg/minikube/tunnel/route_windows_test.go
test/integration/iso_test.go
make: *** [Makefile:501: goimports] Error 1

Make one minimal config, with only the basics. And one maximal with all linters (but no settings).

min

$ make lint GOLINT_VERSION=v2.6.1 GOLINT_CONFIG=.golangci.min.yaml
0 issues.

max

$ make lint GOLINT_VERSION=v2.6.1 GOLINT_CONFIG=.golangci.max.yaml
365 issues:

  • errcheck: 167
  • gocritic: 7
  • gofmt: 1
  • revive: 158
  • staticcheck: 31
  • unparam: 1

Enabling all the "revive" rules has an enormous amount of "issues", so that is not really recommended:

+ settings:
+ revive:
+ enable-all-rules: true
* revive: 10407

The project does not have the resources to maintain the inclusion / exclusion lists needed properly...

The above numbers are without vendored code, in third_party and in vendor/github.com/docker/machine

This double standard is missing issues in code, and is stopping the integration of libmachine into minikube.

Document the default selection and rearrange
in alphabetical order, for easier comparison.
Currently gofmt and goimports have separate targets,
which means that they are forgotten for new changes.
The list of enabled and disabled checks is not
well maintained, so it stops all version upgrades.
Newer versions are showing issues
@afbjorklund afbjorklund requested a review from medyagh November 8, 2025 08:35
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Nov 8, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@afbjorklund: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
integration-docker-crio-linux-x86-64 561bf41 link true /test integration-docker-crio-linux-x86-64
integration-docker-docker-linux-x86-64 561bf41 link true /test integration-docker-docker-linux-x86-64
integration-docker-containerd-linux-x86-64 561bf41 link true /test integration-docker-containerd-linux-x86-64
integration-kvm-docker-linux-x86-64 561bf41 link true /test integration-kvm-docker-linux-x86-64
integration-kvm-crio-linux-x86-64 561bf41 link true /test integration-kvm-crio-linux-x86-64
integration-kvm-containerd-linux-x86-64 561bf41 link true /test integration-kvm-containerd-linux-x86-64
integration-none-docker-linux-x86-64 561bf41 link true /test integration-none-docker-linux-x86-64

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@afbjorklund afbjorklund requested a review from nirs November 8, 2025 09:13
@medyagh
Copy link
Member

medyagh commented Nov 10, 2025

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 10, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: afbjorklund, medyagh

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Nov 10, 2025
@medyagh medyagh merged commit fa71e62 into kubernetes:master Nov 10, 2025
31 of 43 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants