Skip to content

Conversation

@joostjager
Copy link
Contributor

Additional trace logs that helped with debugging #4218 and might be generally useful.

Additional trace logs to help with debugging.
@ldk-reviews-bot
Copy link

ldk-reviews-bot commented Nov 25, 2025

I've assigned @jkczyz as a reviewer!
I'll wait for their review and will help manage the review process.
Once they submit their review, I'll check if a second reviewer would be helpful.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 25, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 89.32%. Comparing base (bb5504e) to head (0647af3).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #4242      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   89.33%   89.32%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         180      180              
  Lines      138680   138683       +3     
  Branches   138680   138683       +3     
==========================================
- Hits       123888   123876      -12     
- Misses      12172    12182      +10     
- Partials     2620     2625       +5     
Flag Coverage Δ
fuzzing 35.00% <14.28%> (-0.99%) ⬇️
tests 88.68% <100.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants