Skip to content

Conversation

@CollinBeczak
Copy link
Collaborator

@CollinBeczak CollinBeczak commented Feb 3, 2026

Related: #2701

- Updated test descriptions for better understanding.
- Changed the test to check for the presence of a breadcrumb instead of a specific text.
- Adjusted the button text assertion to reflect the new fixed status.
Copy link
Contributor

@jake-low jake-low left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think some of these changes might be confusing, in particular the "Edit in Foo" -> "Open in Foo Editor" changes, for these reasons:

  • "Edit in X" makes it clear that this will let you modify something (the data in OSM), but "Open in" could me misinterpreted as merely viewing the data, leading users to be confused when the button launches them into an editing workflow
  • By rephrasing to "Open in X Editor", we're adding an "Editor" suffix to each editor's name. For some of these editors, that leads to an unusual phrasing of the name (at least in English). Specifically, while both "iD" and "the iD editor" are in common use, I've rarely heard anyone say "the JOSM editor" or "the Level0 editor". The shorter forms "JOSM" and "Level0" are far more common.
  • "Edit in X" matches the phrasing of the Edit button on openstreetmap.org, which the MapRoulette edit button draws inspiration from.

On the other hand, I think the "Default Editor" -> "Default External Editor" changes are fine, and help clarify what those settings do.

@CollinBeczak
Copy link
Collaborator Author

What do you think about the location change. Highlighted in this comment: #2701 (comment)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants