add base support for exporting objects and classes in node_loader by rxbryan · Pull Request #343 · metacall/core

rxbryan · 2022-09-15T13:30:21Z

Description

add base support for exporting objects and classes in node_loader

Fixes #(issue_no)

Type of change

Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
This change requires a documentation update
Documentation update

Checklist:

If you are unclear about any of the above checks, have a look at our documentation here.

viferga · 2023-02-07T20:25:53Z

Last commits look pretty well, I recommend you to implement tests in order to verify the behavior. TDD is always easier to develop. Check out metacall-java-test for having an example of how to implement the test.

viferga · 2023-02-15T16:08:52Z

Check out the tests, no one is passing, try to pass them before pushing.

rxbryan · 2023-02-20T10:54:29Z

Check out the tests, no one is passing, try to pass them before pushing.

I just figured out what's making the tests fail. I would fix it as soon as possible

add api for getting all keys and values in adt_set and adt_map

viferga · 2023-02-21T17:11:33Z

I node port it seems there's a bug:

2023-02-21T01:41:33.6835391Z [Tue Feb 21 00:11:52] #13550 [ 4174 | py_loader_impl_gc_print | /usr/local/metacall/source/loaders/py_loader/source/py_loader_impl.c ] @debug : Python Garbage Collector:
2023-02-21T01:41:33.6835405Z
2023-02-21T01:41:33.6835481Z ==13543==T8 TSDDtor
2023-02-21T01:41:33.6835553Z ==13543==T8 exited
2023-02-21T01:41:33.6835560Z
2023-02-21T01:41:33.6835696Z attempt to reference unallocated memory (signal SIGSEGV)

viferga · 2023-02-21T17:13:57Z

Also there's this in windows:

2023-02-21T00:03:25.9422754Z 2023-02-21T00:03:25.9422849Z 2023-02-21T00:03:25.9422997Z 2023-02-21T00:03:25.9423135Z 2023-02-21T00:03:25.9423277Z 2023-02-21T00:03:25.9423433Z 2023-02-21T00:03:25.9423581Z 2023-02-21T00:03:25.9423720Z 2023-02-21T00:03:25.9424017Z 2023-02-21T00:03:25.9424527Z 2023-02-21T00:03:25.9424654Z 2023-02-21T00:03:25.9424665Z
2023-02-21T00:03:25.9424797Z 2023-02-21T00:03:25.9424947Z 2023-02-21T00:03:25.9425037Z 2023-02-21T00:03:25.9425338Z 2023-02-21T00:03:25.9425484Z 2023-02-21T00:03:25.9425636Z 2023-02-21T00:03:25.9425792Z 2023-02-21T00:03:25.9426040Z 2023-02-21T00:03:25.9426232Z 2023-02-21T00:03:25.9426433Z 2023-02-21T00:03:25.9426619Z 2023-02-21T00:03:25.9426811Z 2023-02-21T00:03:25.9427182Z 2023-02-21T00:03:25.9427630Z 2023-02-21T00:03:25.9428053Z 2023-02-21T00:03:25.9428367Z 2023-02-21T00:03:25.9428626Z 2023-02-21T00:03:25.9428886Z 2023-02-21T00:03:25.9429169Z 2023-02-21T00:03:25.9429662Z 2023-02-21T00:03:25.9430150Z 2023-02-21T00:03:25.9430398Z 2023-02-21T00:03:25.9430714Z 2023-02-21T00:03:25.9430924Z 2023-02-21T00:03:25.9431127Z 2023-02-21T00:03:25.9431358Z 2023-02-21T00:03:25.9431580Z 2023-02-21T00:03:25.9431791Z 2023-02-21T00:03:25.9431946Z 2023-02-21T00:03:25.9432093Z ==1552==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: access-violation on unknown address 0x7ff86ac92a68 (pc 0x7ff86ac92a68 bp 0x00000000000f sp 0x0040fcbffa18 T2)
#0 0x7ff86ac92a67 ()
#1 0x7ff89bfa5f24 (C:\Windows\SYSTEM32\ntdll.dll+0x180075f24)
#2 0x7ff89bf532e2 (C:\Windows\SYSTEM32\ntdll.dll+0x1800232e2)
#3 0x7ff89bf8a3dd (C:\Windows\SYSTEM32\ntdll.dll+0x18005a3dd)
#4 0x7ff898798ca9 (C:\Windows\System32\KERNELBASE.dll+0x180078ca9)
#5 0x7ff898ae2793 (C:\Windows\System32\ucrtbase.dll+0x180022793)
#6 0x7ff898ae2690 (C:\Windows\System32\ucrtbase.dll+0x180022690)
#7 0x7ff86133f579 (C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio\2019\Enterprise\VC\Tools\MSVC\14.29.30133\bin\HostX64\x64\clang_rt.asan_dbg_dynamic-x86_64.dll+0x18005f579)
#8 0x7ff89b607ad3 (C:\Windows\System32\KERNEL32.DLL+0x180017ad3)
#9 0x7ff89bf8a370 (C:\Windows\SYSTEM32\ntdll.dll+0x18005a370)
AddressSanitizer can not provide additional info.
SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: access-violation ()
Thread T2 created by T0 here:
#0 0x7ff861340e38 (C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio\2019\Enterprise\VC\Tools\MSVC\14.29.30133\bin\HostX64\x64\clang_rt.asan_dbg_dynamic-x86_64.dll+0x180060e38)
#1 0x7ff898ae2356 (C:\Windows\System32\ucrtbase.dll+0x180022356)
#2 0x7ff85c4f9306 (D:\a\core\core\build\Debug\libnode.dll+0x180419306)
#3 0x7ff85c4f924b (D:\a\core\core\build\Debug\libnode.dll+0x18041924b)
#4 0x7ff8632c15d8 in node_loader_impl_initialize D:\a\core\core\source\loaders\node_loader\source\node_loader_impl.cpp:6577
#5 0x7ff866c26344 in loader_impl_initialize D:\a\core\core\source\loader\source\loader_impl.c:367
#6 0x7ff866c22093 in loader_impl_load_from_file D:\a\core\core\source\loader\source\loader_impl.c:826
#7 0x7ff866c1ea69 in loader_load_from_file D:\a\core\core\source\loader\source\loader.c:317
#8 0x7ff866c2bbc2 in metacall_load_from_file D:\a\core\core\source\metacall\source\metacall.c:348
#9 0x7ff7429f302d in metacall_node_event_loop_test_DefaultConstructor_Test::TestBody(void) D:\a\core\core\source\tests\metacall_node_async_resources_test\source\metacall_node_async_resources_test.cpp:45
#10 0x7ff742a2bc8c in testing::internal::HandleSehExceptionsInMethodIfSupported<class testing::Test, void>(class testing::Test , void (__cdecl testing::Test::)(void), char const *) D:\a\core\core\build\source\tests\src\google-test-depends\googletest\src\gtest.cc:2592
#11 0x7ff742a2b982 in testing::internal::HandleExceptionsInMethodIfSupported<class testing::Test, void>(class testing::Test , void (__cdecl testing::Test::)(void), char const *) D:\a\core\core\build\source\tests\src\google-test-depends\googletest\src\gtest.cc:2643
#12 0x7ff742a08eba in testing::Test::Run(void) D:\a\core\core\build\source\tests\src\google-test-depends\googletest\src\gtest.cc:2682
#13 0x7ff742a099c4 in testing::TestInfo::Run(void) D:\a\core\core\build\source\tests\src\google-test-depends\googletest\src\gtest.cc:2861
#14 0x7ff742a0a201 in testing::TestSuite::Run(void) D:\a\core\core\build\source\tests\src\google-test-depends\googletest\src\gtest.cc:3015
#15 0x7ff742a1082b in testing::internal::UnitTestImpl::RunAllTests(void) D:\a\core\core\build\source\tests\src\google-test-depends\googletest\src\gtest.cc:5855
#16 0x7ff742a2be1c in testing::internal::HandleSehExceptionsInMethodIfSupported<class testing::internal::UnitTestImpl, bool>(class testing::internal::UnitTestImpl , bool (__cdecl testing::internal::UnitTestImpl::)(void), char const *) D:\a\core\core\build\source\tests\src\google-test-depends\googletest\src\gtest.cc:2592
#17 0x7ff742a2bc02 in testing::internal::HandleExceptionsInMethodIfSupported<class testing::internal::UnitTestImpl, bool>(class testing::internal::UnitTestImpl , bool (__cdecl testing::internal::UnitTestImpl::)(void), char const *) D:\a\core\core\build\source\tests\src\google-test-depends\googletest\src\gtest.cc:2643
#18 0x7ff742a0a9d0 in testing::UnitTest::Run(void) D:\a\core\core\build\source\tests\src\google-test-depends\googletest\src\gtest.cc:5438
#19 0x7ff7429f29e0 in RUN_ALL_TESTS(void) D:\a\core\core\build\source\tests\src\google-test-depends\googletest\include\gtest\gtest.h:2490
#20 0x7ff7429f1850 in main D:\a\core\core\source\tests\metacall_node_async_resources_test\source\main.cpp:27
#21 0x7ff742a64f88 in invoke_main D:\a_work\1\s\src\vctools\crt\vcstartup\src\startup\exe_common.inl:78
#22 0x7ff742a64edd in __scrt_common_main_seh D:\a_work\1\s\src\vctools\crt\vcstartup\src\startup\exe_common.inl:288
#23 0x7ff742a64d9d in __scrt_common_main D:\a_work\1\s\src\vctools\crt\vcstartup\src\startup\exe_common.inl:330
#24 0x7ff742a64ffd in mainCRTStartup D:\a_work\1\s\src\vctools\crt\vcstartup\src\startup\exe_main.cpp:16
#25 0x7ff89b607ad3 (C:\Windows\System32\KERNEL32.DLL+0x180017ad3)
#26 0x7ff89bf8a370 (C:\Windows\SYSTEM32\ntdll.dll+0x18005a370)

But I think this has been already solved in develop, can you merge develop into your branch and push so we can see if that test passes?

rxbryan · 2023-02-21T20:49:42Z

Also there's this in windows:

But I think this has been already solved in develop, can you merge develop into your branch and push so we can see if that test passes?

My branch is up-to-date. I don't run windows so I can't really debug the windows test

rxbryan · 2023-02-21T21:29:39Z

I node port it seems there's a bug:

2023-02-21T01:41:33.6835696Z attempt to reference unallocated memory (signal SIGSEGV)

That's not the only problem. There's alot of load_from_file errors... look at this

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "py_loader_impl_load_from_file_path", line 19, in load_from_path
  File "/usr/lib/python3.9/importlib/util.py", line 90, in find_spec
    fullname = resolve_name(name, package) if name.startswith('.') else name
  File "/usr/lib/python3.9/importlib/util.py", line 32, in resolve_name
    raise ImportError(f'no package specified for {repr(name)} '
ImportError: no package specified for './asd.py' (required for relative module names)

 [Tue Feb 21 00:11:38] #13550 [ 3128 | py_loader_impl_load_from_file_exception | /usr/local/metacall/source/loaders/py_loader/source/py_loader_impl.c ] @Error : Python Error: Exception raised while loading the module './badrequire'
[Tue Feb 21 00:11:38] #13550 [ 4088 | py_loader_impl_error_print | /usr/local/metacall/source/loaders/py_loader/source/py_loader_impl.c ] @Error : Python Error: [Type: <class 'ImportError'>]: no package specified for './badrequire' (required for relative module names)
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "py_loader_impl_load_from_file_path", line 19, in load_from_path
  File "/usr/lib/python3.9/importlib/util.py", line 90, in find_spec
    fullname = resolve_name(name, package) if name.startswith('.') else name
  File "/usr/lib/python3.9/importlib/util.py", line 32, in resolve_name
    raise ImportError(f'no package specified for {repr(name)} '
ImportError: no package specified for './badrequire' (required for relative module names)

ception in load_from_file Error: Cannot find module './asd.ts'
    at fileResolve (/usr/local/metacall/build/bootstrap.ts:156:25)
    at /usr/local/metacall/build/bootstrap.ts:169:54
    at Array.map (<anonymous>)
    at load_from_file (/usr/local/metacall/build/bootstrap.ts:169:45)
    at /usr/local/metacall/build/bootstrap.ts:44:21
    at metacall_require (/usr/local/metacall/source/ports/node_port/index.js:189:15)
    at Module.mod.require (/usr/local/metacall/source/ports/node_port/index.js:264:11)
    at require (internal/modules/cjs/helpers.js:74:18)
    at /usr/local/metacall/source/ports/node_port/test/index.js:58:26
    at getActual (assert.js:658:5) {
  code: 'MODULE_NOT_FOUND'
}
[Tue Feb 21 00:11:34] #13550 [ 965 | metacall_handle_export | /usr/local/metacall/source/metacall/source/metacall.c ] @Error : Handle (nil) passed to metacall_handle_export is not valid
NodeJS Loader Error: MetaCall could not load from file
Exception in load_from_file Error: Cannot find module './asd.tsx'
    at fileResolve (/usr/local/metacall/build/bootstrap.ts:156:25)
    at /usr/local/metacall/build/bootstrap.ts:169:54
    at Array.map (<anonymous>)
    at load_from_file (/usr/local/metacall/build/bootstrap.ts:169:45)
    at /usr/local/metacall/build/bootstrap.ts:44:21
    at metacall_require (/usr/local/metacall/source/ports/node_port/index.js:189:15)
    at Module.mod.require (/usr/local/metacall/source/ports/node_port/index.js:264:11)
    at require (internal/modules/cjs/helpers.js:74:18)
    at /usr/local/metacall/source/ports/node_port/test/index.js:59:26
    at getActual (assert.js:658:5) {
  code: 'MODULE_NOT_FOUND'

[Tue Feb 21 00:11:38] #13550 [ 1253 | rb_loader_impl_load_from_file | /usr/local/metacall/source/loaders/rb_loader/source/rb_loader_impl.c ] @Error : No module could be loaded
[Tue Feb 21 00:11:38] #13550 [ 965 | metacall_handle_export | /usr/local/metacall/source/metacall/source/metacall.c ] @Error : Handle (nil) passed to metacall_handle_export is not valid
NodeJS Loader Error: MetaCall could not load from file
==13543==T53: FakeStack created: 0x7f67cb5de000 -- 0x7f67cc0e7000 stack_size_log: 20; mmapped 11300K, noreserve=0 
==13543==T53: stack [0x7f67d9f7d000,0x7f67daf7bf00) size 0xffef00; local=0x7f67daf7be1c
CSLoader loading error: File ./badrequire not found
[Tue Feb 21 00:11:38] #13550 [ 965 | metacall_handle_export | /usr/local/metacall/source/metacall/source/metacall.c ] @Error : Handle (nil) passed to metacall_handle_export is not valid
NodeJS Loader Error: MetaCall could not load from file
[Tue Feb 21 00:11:38] #13550 [ 187 | cob_loader_impl_load_from_file | /usr/local/metacall/source/loaders/cob_loader/source/cob_loader_impl.cpp ] @Error : module 'badrequire' not found
[Tue Feb 21 00:11:38] #13550 [ 965 | metacall_handle_export | /usr/local/metacall/source/metacall/source/metacall.c ] @Error : Handle (nil) passed to metacall_handle_export is not valid
NodeJS Loader Error: MetaCall could not load from file

Where should ./asd.py ./asd.ts asd.cs asd.rb be located. I am able to reproduce the load_from_file errors but not the segfault. Maybe they are related.

viferga · 2023-02-21T22:49:32Z

I node port it seems there's a bug:
2023-02-21T01:41:33.6835696Z attempt to reference unallocated memory (signal SIGSEGV)

That's not the only problem. There's alot of load_from_file errors... look at this

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "py_loader_impl_load_from_file_path", line 19, in load_from_path
  File "/usr/lib/python3.9/importlib/util.py", line 90, in find_spec
    fullname = resolve_name(name, package) if name.startswith('.') else name
  File "/usr/lib/python3.9/importlib/util.py", line 32, in resolve_name
    raise ImportError(f'no package specified for {repr(name)} '
ImportError: no package specified for './asd.py' (required for relative module names)

 [Tue Feb 21 00:11:38] #13550 [ 3128 | py_loader_impl_load_from_file_exception | /usr/local/metacall/source/loaders/py_loader/source/py_loader_impl.c ] @Error : Python Error: Exception raised while loading the module './badrequire'
[Tue Feb 21 00:11:38] #13550 [ 4088 | py_loader_impl_error_print | /usr/local/metacall/source/loaders/py_loader/source/py_loader_impl.c ] @Error : Python Error: [Type: <class 'ImportError'>]: no package specified for './badrequire' (required for relative module names)
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "py_loader_impl_load_from_file_path", line 19, in load_from_path
  File "/usr/lib/python3.9/importlib/util.py", line 90, in find_spec
    fullname = resolve_name(name, package) if name.startswith('.') else name
  File "/usr/lib/python3.9/importlib/util.py", line 32, in resolve_name
    raise ImportError(f'no package specified for {repr(name)} '
ImportError: no package specified for './badrequire' (required for relative module names)

ception in load_from_file Error: Cannot find module './asd.ts'
    at fileResolve (/usr/local/metacall/build/bootstrap.ts:156:25)
    at /usr/local/metacall/build/bootstrap.ts:169:54
    at Array.map (<anonymous>)
    at load_from_file (/usr/local/metacall/build/bootstrap.ts:169:45)
    at /usr/local/metacall/build/bootstrap.ts:44:21
    at metacall_require (/usr/local/metacall/source/ports/node_port/index.js:189:15)
    at Module.mod.require (/usr/local/metacall/source/ports/node_port/index.js:264:11)
    at require (internal/modules/cjs/helpers.js:74:18)
    at /usr/local/metacall/source/ports/node_port/test/index.js:58:26
    at getActual (assert.js:658:5) {
  code: 'MODULE_NOT_FOUND'
}
[Tue Feb 21 00:11:34] #13550 [ 965 | metacall_handle_export | /usr/local/metacall/source/metacall/source/metacall.c ] @Error : Handle (nil) passed to metacall_handle_export is not valid
NodeJS Loader Error: MetaCall could not load from file
Exception in load_from_file Error: Cannot find module './asd.tsx'
    at fileResolve (/usr/local/metacall/build/bootstrap.ts:156:25)
    at /usr/local/metacall/build/bootstrap.ts:169:54
    at Array.map (<anonymous>)
    at load_from_file (/usr/local/metacall/build/bootstrap.ts:169:45)
    at /usr/local/metacall/build/bootstrap.ts:44:21
    at metacall_require (/usr/local/metacall/source/ports/node_port/index.js:189:15)
    at Module.mod.require (/usr/local/metacall/source/ports/node_port/index.js:264:11)
    at require (internal/modules/cjs/helpers.js:74:18)
    at /usr/local/metacall/source/ports/node_port/test/index.js:59:26
    at getActual (assert.js:658:5) {
  code: 'MODULE_NOT_FOUND'

[Tue Feb 21 00:11:38] #13550 [ 1253 | rb_loader_impl_load_from_file | /usr/local/metacall/source/loaders/rb_loader/source/rb_loader_impl.c ] @Error : No module could be loaded
[Tue Feb 21 00:11:38] #13550 [ 965 | metacall_handle_export | /usr/local/metacall/source/metacall/source/metacall.c ] @Error : Handle (nil) passed to metacall_handle_export is not valid
NodeJS Loader Error: MetaCall could not load from file
==13543==T53: FakeStack created: 0x7f67cb5de000 -- 0x7f67cc0e7000 stack_size_log: 20; mmapped 11300K, noreserve=0 
==13543==T53: stack [0x7f67d9f7d000,0x7f67daf7bf00) size 0xffef00; local=0x7f67daf7be1c
CSLoader loading error: File ./badrequire not found
[Tue Feb 21 00:11:38] #13550 [ 965 | metacall_handle_export | /usr/local/metacall/source/metacall/source/metacall.c ] @Error : Handle (nil) passed to metacall_handle_export is not valid
NodeJS Loader Error: MetaCall could not load from file
[Tue Feb 21 00:11:38] #13550 [ 187 | cob_loader_impl_load_from_file | /usr/local/metacall/source/loaders/cob_loader/source/cob_loader_impl.cpp ] @Error : module 'badrequire' not found
[Tue Feb 21 00:11:38] #13550 [ 965 | metacall_handle_export | /usr/local/metacall/source/metacall/source/metacall.c ] @Error : Handle (nil) passed to metacall_handle_export is not valid
NodeJS Loader Error: MetaCall could not load from file

Where should ./asd.py ./asd.ts asd.cs asd.rb be located. I am able to reproduce the load_from_file errors but not the segfault. Maybe they are related.

Those errors are fine. I am reviewing everything, you overwrote all my changes. I am going to try to solve them.

viferga · 2023-02-21T23:40:08Z

I think I almost get it to work, I want still to fully review it locally.

viferga · 2023-02-22T00:54:35Z

Yeah, it seems all tests passed, but I still want to fully review it. Formatting failed because I modified it from the web, but I also want to fully review all the implementation properly, I've seen things that are not clear to me and I need to understand them better and provide better feedback to you. Good job!

viferga · 2025-08-07T15:21:01Z

@rxbryan hey mate I am going to review all this and probably reimplement it using parts of your PR, I prefer doing that because it's the most effective way of reviewing it in depth, specially for debugging complex memory issues or similar.

Once I finish it I will co-author the PR with you so you get credits of the task. This is the last step towards making NodeJS fully interoperable between Python and Ruby.

rxbryan · 2025-08-11T17:23:15Z

Hi @viferga
I am glad this is still worked on.

Once I finish it I will co-author the PR with you so you get credits of the task. This is the last step towards making NodeJS fully interoperable between Python and Ruby.

Iooking forward to that.

rxbryan force-pushed the node-feat1 branch 3 times, most recently from 1a5663b to 53be583 Compare September 15, 2022 17:36

viferga mentioned this pull request Sep 21, 2022

N-API: An api for embedding Node in applications nodejs/node#23265

Open

5 tasks

rxbryan force-pushed the node-feat1 branch from 53be583 to 8cb1c09 Compare September 23, 2022 22:21

rxbryan marked this pull request as draft October 1, 2022 20:47

rxbryan force-pushed the node-feat1 branch 3 times, most recently from 6fb9758 to 1334267 Compare October 2, 2022 14:43

rxbryan force-pushed the node-feat1 branch from 1334267 to f817d9c Compare December 6, 2022 19:11

rxbryan marked this pull request as ready for review December 6, 2022 19:11

rxbryan force-pushed the node-feat1 branch 3 times, most recently from 00bc5a8 to 22e43f3 Compare January 6, 2023 19:24

rxbryan force-pushed the node-feat1 branch 3 times, most recently from 2678438 to 67e344f Compare January 29, 2023 18:15

viferga mentioned this pull request Feb 3, 2023

NodeJS Loader class is not implemented on ML example #132

Closed

rxbryan force-pushed the node-feat1 branch from 67e344f to 641031e Compare February 6, 2023 16:45

rxbryan marked this pull request as draft February 14, 2023 16:16

rxbryan added 3 commits February 16, 2023 07:02

add base support for exporting objects and classes in node_loader

1ea178a

add support for classes in node_loader

1aa8e50

add test for node_loader class

145e5c1

rxbryan force-pushed the node-feat1 branch 2 times, most recently from e44e0ab to f6078f4 Compare February 20, 2023 10:33

add test for node_loader class

18e1f8b

add api for getting all keys and values in adt_set and adt_map

rxbryan force-pushed the node-feat1 branch from f6078f4 to 18e1f8b Compare February 20, 2023 23:52

rxbryan marked this pull request as ready for review February 21, 2023 07:55

viferga added 6 commits February 21, 2023 17:25

Update adt_map.c

abfea4e

Update adt_map.c

58d69a5

Update adt_set.c

faaf896

Update node_loader_impl.cpp

929a674

Update node_test.js

c464136

Delete test.js

9ee81e1

Update node_loader_impl.cpp

11d1be2

Update node_loader_impl.cpp

39a9b74

rxbryan mentioned this pull request Mar 11, 2023

add base support for exporting objects and classes in node_loader#1 #397

Draft

16 tasks

viferga marked this pull request as draft January 24, 2024 15:36

rxbryan mentioned this pull request Mar 26, 2024

[RFC]: achieve ndarray API parity with built-in JavaScript arrays stdlib-js/google-summer-of-code#61

Closed

6 tasks

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

add base support for exporting objects and classes in node_loader#343

add base support for exporting objects and classes in node_loader#343
rxbryan wants to merge 12 commits intometacall:developfrom
rxbryan:node-feat1

rxbryan commented Sep 15, 2022

Uh oh!

viferga commented Feb 7, 2023

Uh oh!

viferga commented Feb 15, 2023

Uh oh!

rxbryan commented Feb 20, 2023 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

viferga commented Feb 21, 2023

Uh oh!

viferga commented Feb 21, 2023

Uh oh!

rxbryan commented Feb 21, 2023

Uh oh!

rxbryan commented Feb 21, 2023

Uh oh!

viferga commented Feb 21, 2023

Uh oh!

viferga commented Feb 21, 2023

Uh oh!

viferga commented Feb 22, 2023

Uh oh!

viferga commented Aug 7, 2025

Uh oh!

rxbryan commented Aug 11, 2025 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants

Conversation

rxbryan commented Sep 15, 2022

Description

Type of change

Checklist:

Uh oh!

viferga commented Feb 7, 2023

Uh oh!

viferga commented Feb 15, 2023

Uh oh!

rxbryan commented Feb 20, 2023 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

viferga commented Feb 21, 2023

Uh oh!

viferga commented Feb 21, 2023

Uh oh!

rxbryan commented Feb 21, 2023

Uh oh!

rxbryan commented Feb 21, 2023

Uh oh!

viferga commented Feb 21, 2023

Uh oh!

viferga commented Feb 21, 2023

Uh oh!

viferga commented Feb 22, 2023

Uh oh!

viferga commented Aug 7, 2025

Uh oh!

rxbryan commented Aug 11, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants

rxbryan commented Feb 20, 2023 •

edited

Loading

rxbryan commented Aug 11, 2025 •

edited

Loading