-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 466
fix(streamable-http): prevent SSE reconnect loops with shadow channels #660
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
its-mash
wants to merge
9
commits into
modelcontextprotocol:main
Choose a base branch
from
mcpmux:fix/sse-channel-replacement-conflict
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+892
−37
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
f9f357f
fix(streamable-http): return 409 Conflict when standalone SSE stream …
its-mash a282c3b
fix(streamable-http): handle resume with completed request-wise channel
its-mash 897e3d9
fix: allow SSE channel replacement instead of 409 Conflict
its-mash b0d759a
fix: skip cache replay when replacing active SSE stream
its-mash 96204c5
fix: use shadow channels to prevent SSE reconnect loops
its-mash 4e30c89
test: comprehensive shadow channel tests (15 cases)
its-mash 56ba3cb
fix: use correct HTTP status codes for session errors per MCP spec
its-mash d711f2c
fix: address review feedback — remove dead Conflict variant, restore …
its-mash e01dacb
fix: use minimal buffer for shadow streams and cap at 32
its-mash File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The
shadow_txs: Vec<Sender<ServerSseMessage>>vector can grow indefinitely. If a client misbehaves or has a bug, it could open hundreds of GET streams, each creating a new sender. The cleanup withretain(!is_closed())only happens at the beginning ofresume(), so there's a period when all shadows are active at the same time. It would be helpful to add an upper limit.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
agree, updated