Skip to content

Conversation

@brian-smith-tcril
Copy link
Contributor

Following the pattern from openedx/paragon#4052

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 19, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 72.22%. Comparing base (59ac43b) to head (b4b2b93).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #660   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   72.22%   72.22%           
=======================================
  Files          56       56           
  Lines         504      504           
  Branches      108      108           
=======================================
  Hits          364      364           
  Misses        137      137           
  Partials        3        3           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

with:
semantic_version: 16
env:
GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.SEMANTIC_RELEASE_GITHUB_TOKEN }}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does this mean we also don't need to use the SEMANTIC_RELASE_GITHUB user token?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@brian-smith-tcril brian-smith-tcril Dec 19, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Based on the example in the semantic-release docs I think we should be able to just use secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN instead, but I'd like to update everything to use OIDC first, then go through and remove the semantic release token from all workflows/the org.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants