-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 209
Add travel fund guidelines to balance cost with practicality #1696
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Tobie Langel <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Tobie Langel <[email protected]>
ctcpip
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks great!
Clarified travel fund request guidelines to include potential for partial funding based on estimated costs. Signed-off-by: Tobie Langel <[email protected]>
Clarified travel fund request guidelines and emphasized partial funding possibility. Signed-off-by: Tobie Langel <[email protected]>
|
Thanks @ctcpip. I added another sentence about partial funding, so would appreciate if you could take another look at it. Sorry for sending this in two batches. |
Signed-off-by: Tobie Langel <[email protected]>
Clarified language regarding travel fund requests to emphasize cost-effectiveness and safety. Signed-off-by: Tobie Langel <[email protected]>
Ethan-Arrowood
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we have more policy changes to discuss later, but this is a great change for the immediate term.
sheplu
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Signed-off-by: Tobie Langel <[email protected]>
No description provided.