Skip to content
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 2 additions & 0 deletions content/news/cfp-review/contents.lr
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -36,6 +36,8 @@ Generally speaking, we look to see that the speaker has provided enough detail f

As you can imagine, much of this evaluation is subjective and prone to different biases that our reviewers hold. For this reason, we like to have a diverse set of volunteers reviewing the proposals. If you are interested in being a reviewer, please email <a href="mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a>.

Focus on technologies and systems rather than brands and services. Our audience and reviewers tend to be very sensitive to talks that feel more like a sales pitch than a tech talk. Presenters are welcome to mention their company, but the core of the talk should be brand-agnostic or applicable to open tooling. For a positive example, [this talk from 2025](https://youtu.be/5CrmK2dwbRA). The speaker talks about Streamlit, which is a product from Snowflake. Critically, though, she focuses on the free and open-source parts to the technology (the streamlit library) and not on the paid portions (the hosting service). It's also helpful that she provided a totally-free alternative as a comparison.

## What Happens After the Review is Complete?

Once our review is complete and we have a list of talks selected for our conference program we will email each speaker to let them know of our decision **the week of November 21, 2025** and publicly announce speakers on **December 21, 2025**.
Expand Down