Suggest using MCP and RFC for substancial changes

[apiraino]

As per discussion on Zulip, our documentation is probably not clarifying immediately the paths to contribute substancial changes (MCP/RFC).

Added a little bit of wording and links to hopefully help new contributors.

r?

thanks!

(suggestions on wording are welcome!)

Rendered

[rustbot]

r? @lukas-code

rustbot has assigned @lukas-code.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

Why was this reviewer chosen?

The reviewer was selected based on:

• Owners of files modified in this PR: compiler
• compiler expanded to 68 candidates
• Random selection from 67 candidates

[rustbot]

Error: Parsing assign command in comment failed: ...'
' | error: specify user to assign to at >| '
thanks!
'...

Please file an issue on GitHub at triagebot if there's a problem with this bot, or reach out on #triagebot on Zulip.

[Urgau]

It's probably also worth linking T-libs-api ACP and T-lang experiments.

View changes since this review

[rustbot]

Error: Parsing assign command in comment failed: ...'
' | error: specify user to assign to at >| '
thanks!
'...

Please file an issue on GitHub at triagebot if there's a problem with this bot, or reach out on #triagebot on Zulip.

[rustbot]

Error: Parsing assign command in comment failed: ...'
' | error: specify user to assign to at >| '
thanks!
'...

Please file an issue on GitHub at triagebot if there's a problem with this bot, or reach out on #triagebot on Zulip.

[apiraino]

@Urgau @jieyouxu I've added bootstrap and libs but I'm not t-infra - I am not sure if per se they have a concept of "substancial changes".

Reads better now?

[apiraino]

I gathered this info spelunking on Zulip but it's not documented anywhere. I've just learned myself what "ACP" means 😅