Conversation
53ac6f7 to
879a95c
Compare
|
A quick benchmark run shows no very significant changes (the bar of "significant" being fairly high due to unpinned CPU freq.). Benchmark |
|
It may make sense to hold off merging this for a while. It conflicts with #1659. |
879a95c to
2ea2995
Compare
|
5-10% of performance drop is a bit too much for noise even with unpinned frequency considering that |
Time0.65% |
2ea2995 to
c0991db
Compare
|
Updated. We've been depending on |
|
Before removing it, should we make a final release updating the README to say it's deprecated? |
|
Should we mark it as deprecated? Certainly not now (no final release of Later? I don't see much point since it won't be compatible with the next rand_core version. Also, I don't see any need to force people to migrate (no known security issues or other major problems). So I feel that we shouldn't. |
|
So it's just being migrated to a different repo then, right? |
|
I think we can move |
Summary
Source moved: rust-random/rngs#68