Add GType registration for SugarEventController and SugarSwipeController states

[MostlyKIGuess]

Content:

• This Pull Request adds GType registration for the SugarEventController and SugarSwipeController states. This ensures that the enums are properly registered with the GObject type system, resolving the undeclared identifier errors.

Changes:

• Added sugar_event_controller_state_get_type function to register SugarEventControllerState enum.
• Added sugar_swipe_direction_get_type and sugar_swipe_direction_flags_get_type functions to register SugarSwipeDirection and SugarSwipeDirectionFlags enums.
• Updated sugar-key-grabber.c to include the generated sugar-marshal.h and replaced deprecated functions.

Fixes:

• Make erros that occured.

[MostlyKIGuess]

error logs:

sugar-event-controller.c: In function 'sugar_event_controller_class_init': sugar-event-controller.c:123:55: error: 'SUGAR_TYPE_EVENT_CONTROLLER_STATE' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'SUGAR_TYPE_EVENT_CONTROLLER'? 123 | SUGAR_TYPE_EVENT_CONTROLLER_STATE, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | SUGAR_TYPE_EVENT_CONTROLLER sugar-event-controller.c:123:55: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in

sugar-swipe-controller.c: In function 'sugar_swipe_controller_class_init': sugar-swipe-controller.c:374:56: error: 'SUGAR_TYPE_SWIPE_DIRECTION_FLAGS' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'SUGAR_SWIPE_DIRECTION_FLAG_UP'? 374 | SUGAR_TYPE_SWIPE_DIRECTION_FLAGS, 0, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | SUGAR_SWIPE_DIRECTION_FLAG_UP sugar-swipe-controller.c:374:56: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in sugar-swipe-controller.c:386:19: error: 'SUGAR_TYPE_SWIPE_DIRECTION' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'SUGAR_SWIPE_DIRECTION_UP'? 386 | SUGAR_TYPE_SWIPE_DIRECTION); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | SUGAR_SWIPE_DIRECTION_UP

[chimosky]

You commit message can be better written to contain some of the things you've written in your opening comment, also include the make errors.

[MostlyKIGuess]

You commit message can be better written to contain some of the things you've written in your opening comment, also include the make errors.

So 2 commits with respective title , then on description I will add the reason and the make error.?

[quozl]

I agree, commit message should be better, but not willing to rewrite it myself otherwise I'd squash. You do read existing commits I hope?

I note the documentation build check is failing.

[MostlyKIGuess]

I agree, commit message should be better, but not willing to rewrite it myself otherwise I'd squash. You do read existing commits I hope?

I note the documentation build check is failing.

Are the current commits better? I am not sure what to change here so..

• The documentation has been failing for quite a long time.

[quozl]

Yes, the documentation build for this pull request is still failing; does GitHub not show this in an all checks have failed window above the comment entry box? If not, it may be an access problem. @chimosky what do you see?

Edit: followup mail notification shows other pull requests without reference to this one, so please remember to link them up next time.

#481

[MostlyKIGuess]

Yes, the documentation build for this pull request is still failing; does GitHub not show this in an all checks have failed window above the comment entry box? If not, it may be an access problem. @chimosky what do you see?

Edit: followup mail notification shows other pull requests without reference to this one, so please remember to link them up next time.

#481

Oh yeah I will convert that to draft as well , we discussed this on matrix no soln found as of now.

[MostlyKIGuess]

not needed.

[chimosky]

Yes, the documentation build for this pull request is still failing; does GitHub not show this in an all checks have failed window above the comment entry box? If not, it may be an access problem. @chimosky what do you see?

Edit: followup mail notification shows other pull requests without reference to this one, so please remember to link them up next time.

#481

The build does fail, but it only fails per commit.