Skip to content

Conversation

@philippecamacho
Copy link
Collaborator

@philippecamacho philippecamacho commented Dec 8, 2025

Closes https://app.asana.com/1/1208976916964769/project/1209976130071762/task/1211892212379882?focus=true

This PR:

Simplifies the implementation of the function isValidBatchTx in order to prepare the implementation of the fallback mechanism. Indeed the change only consists of ignoring the check relative to the sender of the transaction as the Batch Inbox contract will reject the transaction if its sender is not a legitimate (i.e. active) batcher.

This PR does not:

Fully implement the fallback mechanism.

…ch Inbox contract verifies the sender is legitimate.
Copy link
Member

@shenkeyao shenkeyao left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Should we also update the wiki book to document this change?

@philippecamacho
Copy link
Collaborator Author

LGTM. Should we also update the wiki book to document this change?

Yes. https://app.asana.com/1/1208976916964769/project/1209976130071762/task/1212358918705029?focus=true

@philippecamacho philippecamacho merged commit 7113933 into celo-integration-rebase-14.1 Dec 10, 2025
31 checks passed
@philippecamacho philippecamacho deleted the philippe/update-deriv-pipeline-fallback branch December 10, 2025 11:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants