Skip to content

Conversation

@chienandalu
Copy link
Member

WIP

for testing purposes of #1614

cc @Tecnativa

@chienandalu chienandalu changed the title [17.0][MIG] mail_gategay_telegram: Migration to v17 [17.0][MIG] mail_gateway_telegram: Migration to v17 Mar 5, 2025
@chienandalu chienandalu force-pushed the 17.0-mig-mail_gateway_telegram branch 2 times, most recently from 74be63d to 2c91203 Compare March 18, 2025 10:50
@github-actions
Copy link

There hasn't been any activity on this pull request in the past 4 months, so it has been marked as stale and it will be closed automatically if no further activity occurs in the next 30 days.
If you want this PR to never become stale, please ask a PSC member to apply the "no stale" label.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale PR/Issue without recent activity, it'll be soon closed automatically. label Aug 17, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot closed this Sep 21, 2025
@pedrobaeza pedrobaeza reopened this Sep 22, 2025
@pedrobaeza pedrobaeza marked this pull request as ready for review September 22, 2025 09:29
@pedrobaeza
Copy link
Member

/ocabot migration mail_gateway_telegram

@OCA-git-bot OCA-git-bot added this to the 17.0 milestone Sep 22, 2025
@OCA-git-bot OCA-git-bot mentioned this pull request Sep 22, 2025
40 tasks
@pedrobaeza pedrobaeza force-pushed the 17.0-mig-mail_gateway_telegram branch 3 times, most recently from 559f763 to 187aa4f Compare September 22, 2025 10:37
@pedrobaeza pedrobaeza force-pushed the 17.0-mig-mail_gateway_telegram branch from 187aa4f to 1683a67 Compare September 22, 2025 10:46
@pedrobaeza pedrobaeza removed the stale PR/Issue without recent activity, it'll be soon closed automatically. label Sep 22, 2025
@Bearnard21
Copy link

@chienandalu Hello, will you proceed with the PR?

@chienandalu
Copy link
Member Author

@Bearnard21 You can freely supersed it as I used it was just for testing purposes of the base mail_gateway one. For this one I got a quite functional state, but some extra work will be needed to finish it.

In any case, you've got #1711 as well

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants