Skip to content

feat(sim): add land-cover clutter inputs#69

Draft
Komzpa wants to merge 14 commits into
meshtastic:masterfrom
Komzpa:codex/split-clutter-osm
Draft

feat(sim): add land-cover clutter inputs#69
Komzpa wants to merge 14 commits into
meshtastic:masterfrom
Komzpa:codex/split-clutter-osm

Conversation

@Komzpa
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@Komzpa Komzpa commented May 2, 2026

Summary

  • add optional land-cover clutter CSV loading and path excess-loss calculation
  • add OSM/Overpass-to-clutter CSV exporter as a standalone data-prep tool
  • add CLI flags for explicit clutter grids and profile sampling, layered on top of the map/SRTM input slice
  • keep terrain on the automatic --terrain-srtm path from feat(sim): add map and terrain inputs #68; this PR only adds clutter CSV as the separate land-cover input
  • document clutter input usage and test clutter parsing, cache behavior, and OSM payload validation

Stack

Validation

  • /tmp/meshtasticator-pr68-venv/bin/python -m unittest tests.test_clutter tests.test_osm_clutter tests.test_lora_mesh_cli tests.test_node tests.test_terrain tests.test_map_input
  • /home/kom/.local/bin/ruff check loraMesh.py lib/config.py lib/common.py lib/map_input.py lib/node.py lib/packet.py lib/terrain.py lib/clutter.py lib/osm_clutter.py tests/test_clutter.py tests/test_osm_clutter.py tests/test_lora_mesh_cli.py tests/test_node.py tests/test_terrain.py tests/test_map_input.py
  • git diff --check
  • previously for this slice: compileall; full-suite baseline still has the unrelated test_discrete_sim_ten_nodes messageSeq mismatch from origin/master

@Komzpa Komzpa force-pushed the codex/split-clutter-osm branch from 4a15bdb to 9dd0612 Compare May 15, 2026 20:50
@Komzpa Komzpa force-pushed the codex/split-clutter-osm branch from 9dd0612 to 8d42668 Compare May 15, 2026 21:01
@Komzpa Komzpa marked this pull request as ready for review May 17, 2026 17:24
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 8d42668099

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread lib/node.py
Comment thread lib/packet.py
@Komzpa Komzpa marked this pull request as draft May 17, 2026 17:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant